Daily Insight

U.S. stocks rallied, pushing the broad market higher for the third-straight day, after the Commerce Department reported second-quarter GDP was revised significantly higher. This followed a durable goods orders report, the first look at this segment of the economy for the current quarter, that offered a reasonable indication the business side of the economy will offset potential consumer weakness as inflation has put a halt to real income growth.

The caveat is that after three days of stock-market gains, we have a pretty good idea of what’s to follow in this market. We’re in a trading range, as we’ve explained for some time now; there is no reason to ignore it. A multitude of uncertainties reign down and will affect the market for a while still. These range from questions over the duration of the housing market; to inflation, and thus what Fed policy will look like if this trend does not abate; to across-the-board tax rate uncertainty, weighing heavily on investor sentiment; and geopolitical risks, which will be with us for a long time.

But these situations present opportunities. There are a number of sectors that currently trade at attractive valuations – in addition both large and mid-cap indices will trade at very low levels once the financial sector flattens out --, and thus present strong multi-year return potential. However, we should all be prepared for continued sideways trading and possibly further declines. Patience will eventually pay off though.

Market Activity for August 28, 2008
Back to yesterday’s activity, nine of the 10 major industry groups gained ground; energy shares were the only loser. Financials, industrials, consumer discretionary and basic materials lead the way – health-care and information technology shares also posted nice increases.

Crude-oil prices fell $2.42, or 2.05%, to close at $115.73 yesterday even as TS Gustav (soon to be a hurricane, but now only expected to make it to category 2) appears on track to hit Gulf of Mexico energy infrastructure. One reason for the decline was a statement out of the IEA (International Energy Agency) that they would supply strategic stockpiles if needed. This would include the release of stockpiles from European gasoline supplies. The downgrade to cat. 2 also helped a great deal.

On the economic front, GDP was revised much higher, showing the economy grew at a 3.3% real annualized rate – the initial estimate had the figure at 1.9%. We’ll get another revision to the number next month, but it shouldn’t change much from here as all data for the quarter is in by this point.

The components that led to the higher revision were personal consumption, net exports and the change in inventories.

• Personal consumption was revised to show a 1.24 percentage-point contribution to real growth from 1.08 initially.
  
• The change in inventories subtracted less-than-initially estimated taking 1.44 percentage-points from growth vs. the 1.92 percentage-point drag initially.
  
• Net exports exploded, offsetting the drag from inventories, adding 3.10 percentage-points vs. the 2.42 contribution estimated last month
  

Residential fixed investment (housing) was unchanged. This component subtracted 0.62 percentage-point and the main point here is that this is half the average drag of the past nine quarters when the segment was subtracting more than a full percentage point.

Many continue to say current quarter growth will be a payback period for this much stronger-than-expected reading – meaning third-quarter GDP will be very weak if not negative. They cite the fact that the end of rebate checks will cause the personal consumption component to ease. While this may be true, not so much because the ridiculous rebate check scheme comes to a close but simply because income growth has not outpaced the jump in inflation of late (real income growth is flat as both year-over-year income and inflation have risen at roughly the same rate). Thankfully, strong productivity improvements have held back consumer-level inflation more than otherwise would be the case as import, producer and intermediate goods prices soar.

What those predicting a weak Q3 GDP reading may be missing is strong business spending trends and the likelihood this will offset the weakness on the consumer side. Further, even though the drag from inventories was less than first expected in the second quarter, it still posted a large weight on GDP. As business sales continue to rise and inventory-to-sales ratios sit at record low levels, an inventory boost should also help to keep third-quarter GDP somewhat upbeat.

Real year-over-year GDP has increased 2.2% even as residential construction has declined 22.2% -- this illustrates the breadth and dynamism of the U.S. economy.

I’ll note that real final sales (GDP minus inventories) jumped 4.8% last quarter, which followed a 3.9% reading in the first quarter. This final sales figure will ease over the next couple of quarters as inventories rise, and this production will push the headline GDP figure higher.

In a separate report the Labor Department reported that initial jobless claims fell 10,000 to 425,000 in the week ended August 23. This number remains elevated and it’s not good that it remains above the 400k level, but we are seeing some signs that the effect of the government’s program to extend unemployment benefits is waning.

The four-week average for jobless claims did tick down ever so slightly and I think there’s a good chance we’ll see a mild trend lower over the next few weeks. Thirteen states and territories reported an increase in jobless claims, while 40 showed a decrease.

Unfortunately, continuing claims (those on the dole for longer than one week) will remain elevated for a while as the government’s assistance program extended the time (normally 26 weeks) one can collect the hand out.

I’ll leave you today with graphs of real (inflation-adjusted) GDP and after-tax income per capita of the past quarter century.

The charts below are quite enlarged but it was necessary in order to read the percentage increase figures.

Disposable (after-tax) income on an inflation-adjusted basis up 3.0% per year since 1981 – that is huge and explains the level of prosperity we enjoy today.

Have a great weekend and holiday!

Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks rose yesterday after durable goods orders unexpectedly rose in July and concerns over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac waned for a second day – for now at least, who knows when the next article comes out that causes investors to concentrate more on hypotheticals than current realities and thus swing perceptions back in the other direction.

The durable goods news, which we’ll touch on below, was great to see and may be illustrating – as we’ve mentioned for a couple of months now – that the business side of things will help to offset future weakness that may arise on the consumer side as real (inflation adjusted) income growth has flattened of late and housing prices continue to decline.

All but one of the 10 major industry groups gained ground yesterday – health-care was the laggard. Financial, energy, basic material and information technology shares led the way.

Market Activity for August 27, 2008
The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) stated a couple of days back that its “problem list” of banks increased 30% in the second quarter – the figure rose from 90 to 117, marking the highest level since mid-2003. “Problem” institutions are those under closer regulatory scrutiny, meaning their capital cushions are weak.

The media has jumped all over this, but it is hardly an issue at this point – it’s not like we’re talking about the highest level in 20 year, far from it. And think about it, do you even recall hearing about the FDIC “problem list” in 2003? I don’t, which shows this is a relatively low level. In terms of actual failures this year, the figure sits at nine. There will be more to come, but we shouldn’t get carried away.

What this does illustrates is that strong bank earnings may not return anytime soon – it had been expected banking-sector profits would rebound in the fourth quarter; the return of much better results won’t be seen until next year.

But back to actual failures, for now these are being reported over weekends. When bank failures begin to get reported on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, that’s when you’ll know the FDIC pipeline is filling up. It’s been reported that to this point 99% of banks and thrifts remain “well-capitalized.”

On the economic front, the Commerce Department reported durable goods orders unexpectedly rose in July as overall orders increased 1.3%. The ex-transportation figure rose 0.7%. The expectation was for overall orders to come in unchanged from June and ex-trans to decline 0.7%.

These are very healthy increases especially considering orders have trended higher for three months now – total orders are up 11.3% at an annual rate since April and ex-trans up 11% annualized for the same period.

The component that we watch most closely is non-defense capital goods, ex-aircraft (a proxy for business capital spending). The figure jumped 2.6% in July and is up 14.4% at an annualized rate over the last three months – so the nice bounce we’ve seen in business spending continues. This reading is being helped by the increased current-year write-off allowance and bonus depreciation schedule that President Bush demanded to be added to the government’s “stimulus” package back in May – these policy decisions provide meaningful incentives.

Capital spending will help to keep GDP positive this quarter as other components may weigh on growth. The trend in capital goods orders is encouraging -- the segment continues to be driven by industrial machinery orders.

Shipments have outpaced inventories for two months now, pushing the I-S (inventory-to-shipments) ratio lower, which is a good sign for future orders growth. That said we should expect to see durable orders decline when the August number is released simply because of the strength over the past three months – a respite over the next month or two would be quite natural as orders for these big ticket items can fluctuate wildly. The media would use it to spread their proclivity toward hyperbole and typical gloom and doom prose, but we should all be conditioned for this by now.

More economists are coming around to the notion that the credit-market troubles are not having an adverse effect on capital expenditures – this is why we’ve spent several letters over the past few months explaining that corporate cash levels are at or near an all-time high; firms have the resources to engage in projects and large equipment purchases without necessarily borrowing to do it. This is the power of the double-digit profit growth that took Q3 2002 through Q2 2007 – that period of 10%-plus earnings increases marked a post-WWII record and we continue to see feel the benefits today.

This morning we get the first revision to second-quarter GDP, which will be revised higher. Back in July we estimated that GDP would post 2.5%-3.0% real growth at an annual rate, which looked pretty much off the mark when the number came out at 1.9%. This revision should show that estimate was pretty close after all as the figure is expected to be revised up to show 2.7% real growth. A narrower trade gap, stronger-than-initially estimated business spending and better-than-expected inventory data will be the reasons for the upward revision.

The latest durable goods orders figure has also led to higher third-quarter GDP estimates.

Have a great day!

Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks ended mixed on Tuesday as the Dow and S&P 500 closed a bit higher, while the NASDAQ failed to gain ground as information technology shares struggled.

Analysts’ comments on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – explaining that the two GSEs have enough capital to withstand losses through the end of the year and still keep a capital cushion above their requirement – helped financials shares gain ground. Energy shares also helped the broad market close higher as oil prices rose for a third-straight session as what is now Tropical Storm Gustav is on a projected path to threaten the Gulf.

Market Activity for August 26, 2008
All in all, seven of the 10 major industry groups closed yesterday’s session higher. Consumer staples, information technology and telecom shares were the losers.

The dollar has staged a very welcome rally of late as it has become evident the super-strong euro made zero sense considering the Eurozone economy has weakened considerably. This may force the European Central Bank to lower interest rates – they had been increasing rates even in the face of weakness as unions (which are much more powerful in Europe than here in the U.S.) force wages higher. The liklihood that the interest rate differential between the EU and U.S. will move in our favor has been one reason for dollar strength.


Oil prices have also moved substantially lower, as everyone knows – falling 20% from the all-time high hit on July 3. This trend is in jeopardy though as Gustav tracks toward Gulf of Mexico energy infrastructure. Evacuations of oil and natural gas production facilities are scheduled to begin as early as today.

In addition, Russia continues their disruptive behavior (which appears to be the correct term for now, their actions could escalate into something worse if not confronted) as they see how far they can push things. Their immediate objective: Gain control of the Tbilisi pipeline – the only Caspian-region oil flow to Western Europe that they do not have control over – and determining the future political environment of Eastern Europe. NATO needs to step up; this is their backyard; this is their reason for existence. Problem is European militaries have been so degraded that the Euros seem to have neither the will nor the ability to commit troops.

So we’ll see we’re these issues take the price of oil. For now, let’s hope Gustav misses major oil infrastructure – good news is the industry caps rigs very effectively these days and can get up and running again very quickly.

On the economic front yesterday housing data dominated.

First, we had the release of the S&P Case/Shiller Home Price Index and its tracking of 20 major cities showed prices declined 15.92% from the year-ago period. That’s quite a large drop and much worse than the National Association of Realtors, Commerce Department and OFHEO surveys have shown.

We’ll note that this survey’s reading (Case/Shiller) has been dragged lower by six cities – L.A., San Diego, Las Vegas, Miami, San Francisco and Phoenix – all down at least 25% year-over-year. These were the areas that exhibited the largest price spikes over the previous three years. As a result of its narrow reach, this survey does not show the true picture for home values across the nation as the aforementioned areas were where the most speculation took place.

On the bright side, the survey does show that price declines are waning from a three-month annualized perspective, decelerating to a decline of 10.05% vs. price declines of 15.87% in May, which followed a 21.73% hit in April and 24.98% in March.

Shortly after the release of Case/Shiller, we received the OFHEO Home Price Index. (OFHEO stands for Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight and is a much broader-based survey. This survey’s main fault is that higher-end homes are not included, yet it does offer a better look at the housing situation from a national perspective.)

The OFHEO survey showed prices fell 5% from the year-ago period, coming in flat for June (meaning zero change) relative to the May figure.

Lastly, the Commerce Department reported that their new home sales report showed prices declined 6.3% from the year-ago period.

So we put the existing home sales data (which we touched on yesterday), the new home data and the OFHEO survey together and it shows home prices are down 6.1% on average over the past 12 months. This is quite different from the degree to which Case/Shiller is showing values declined and I think closer to the truth from a national perspective.


In terms of new home sales, they rose 2.4% in July, halting a two-month decline, to 515,000 at an annual rate -- new home sales have declined during 12 of the past 15 months. Lower prices may be starting to work, but I’m not convinced we’ve stabilized just yet – more data will be needed to confirm this.


The best news within the report was that the supply of new homes on the market fell a meaningful 5.2% to 10.1 months’ worth of supply at the current sales pace (as the chart below illustrates). While this level of stockpiles remains very elevated the trend is moving in the correct direction at least -- off from 11.2 months’ worth in March.


Important: The number of unsold new homes on the market has declined for 15-straight months. The problem is when the figure is matched against the sales rate (which is that 10.1 months’ worth of supply number mentioned above) supply remains very elevated. However, when sales do bounce that months’ worth of inventory figure should drop very quickly.

We need to see the above chart get to nine months worth before we get too excited and then work its way down to six months’ worth before home construction will begin to add to GDP again – this whole process will likely take another year to play out and we can’t rule out two-full years before this occurs. In any event, it will be a very nice plus when housing merely flattens out; at which point it will no longer subtract from GDP and this will be a substantial positive.

Have a great day!


Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks continued along the path of vacillation, erasing the last three sessions of gains and returning the broad market to last Tuesday’s level.

The press advanced the notion that yesterday’s existing home data, which showed prices down 7% from the year-ago period, was the culprit for the move lower. But this is what needs to occur in order to reduce home-inventory levels that remain extremely elevated – not to mention that this degree of price decline was expected anyway.

Certainly financial shares put pressure on the market as third-quarter losses are now estimated to be larger than previous expectations. However, the losses were widespread, as every major industry group came under pressure – the best performing sector was utilities and even they were down 1.10%; most sectors lost between 1.50%-2.00%.

So it was not all about financials, it was something more. Iran claiming to do away with Israel, again, and Senator Obama’s economic proposal likely didn’t help things either.

Market Activity for August 25, 2008
On the Obama proposal, it seems now that he will not attempt to raise only the top two income tax rates, but the top three as the WSJ reported married couples with taxable incomes of more than $165,000 will see their marginal bracket raised to 36%. This doesn’t just raise the 33% tax bracket (currently the second-highest rate) but also much of those within the 28% bracket. (The range for the 28% bracket consists of married couples making between $131,451 and $200,300). Of course, the top rate would be raised to 39.6% from the current 35%.

This likely caused the market to believe his plans to raise tax rates will be worse than expected. For instance, if the proposal will now raise rates for more than just the two top brackets – which is bad enough as those within these brackets are the main source of capital supplied to the private sector – what’s to say this potential administration will refrain from raising the rates on dividends and capital gains more than currently proposed?

Of course, the more the Obama camp talks this way the less likely they are to actually win, so maybe we should hope they keep talking. Hopefully, no one clues them in on how politicians are not supposed to talk about raising taxes until after they are actually elected. Talking this way is a mistake on their part, and while harmful to stocks in the short-term, it could turn out to be a plus as this strategy is not one that wins elections. Add in that most other countries around the globe are doing the opposite and lowering tax rates such proposals are not only unacceptable, but illustrate a complete lack of understanding over the importance of global competitiveness in the current epoch. And that is what this commentary is all about. It is not about Senator Obama per se, but the harmful effects to our entire economy that such actions would cause.

Then we had the Iranian comments, which are nothing new but do keep geopolitical risks front and center.

I think one could look at all that is weighing on the market – tax talk, housing correction, inflation rising, Iran/Russia – and be fairly surprised the broad market has held up as well as it has. Surely, we could move another leg lower, but the fact that equity valuations within a number of industry groups appear long-term very attractive may just work as a buoy for stocks.

You say buoy? Values are falling! Yes, but we are just 19% from the all-time high the S&P 500 reached on October 9 – with the short-term headwinds the market faces (much of this uncertainty may never come to fruition but it does weigh down), it could be worse if not for reasonable valuations almost across the board.

On the economic front, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported existing home sales rose 3.1% in July to an annual rate of 5.00 million, surpassing the consensus estimate of 4.91 million units. The median home price dropped 7% from July 2007, according to the report. (Single-family home sales are down 12.4% over the past 12 months, but up at an annual rate of 4.7% over the past three months, which is somewhat encouraging.)

The combination of tighter lending standards, an increase in foreclosures and potential buyers waiting for signals of a bottom has pushed prices lower.

This is not something the homeowner likes to hear, but it is a necessary condition to reduce the supply of homes on the market, which sit at a record high. This is evident by what has occurred in the West where the pick up in sales has been most striking – prices are down 22% in that region from year-ago levels. Of course, this is an area where much speculation took place as well.
(Note: This inventory measure that has hit a new high includes both single-family homes and condo sales – an increase in the supply of condos was due to projects started 12-18 months back. In terms of just those defined as single-family homes, the inventory figure did tick down to 10.6 months’ worth – a 3.6% decline from the prior month.)

We’ll point out even as existing home prices have declined 7% over the past year – and will fall at least a bit further as foreclosure rates keep supply elevated – the median price remains 15.5% higher over the past five years and up 5% since July 2004. Point is, with the exception of those that had purchased a home in just the past three years, most are still higher from the point of purchase. Since 1999, the median price for an existing home is up 50.6%.

All that said, this rise in existing home sales is encouraging especially since pending sales have risen 32.2% at an annual rate over the last three months, which may suggest things are beginning to stabilize. We’ll need another couple of months of data still to confirm this, however.



Have a great day!


Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Daily Insight

(from August 25, 2008)

U.S. stocks rallied big on Friday, led by financial and consumer discretionary shares, as oil plunged $6.59 per barrel, or 5.44%. That decline erased the prior day’s increase, sending crude back to $115 per barrel.

For the week, the S&P 500 and Dow average slipped 0.46% and 0.27%, respectively. A rally in the back-half of the week nearly erased an ugly start – the broad market lost 2.45% during the first two trading sessions. The NASDAQ Composite was a different story as tech stocks failed to participate in the Wednesday/Thursday upswing – the index fell 1.54% for the week.

Market Activity for August 22, 2008
On Friday, while financial and consumer discretionary shares led the market higher – a trend that broke down the previous three days – there were other bright spots as industrial, information technology and consumer staple shares all rose more than 1.10%.

For the year, the broad market, as measured by the S&P 500, is down 12.00% and we have moved to a lower trading range as uncertainties over future tax rates (and the direct effect this has on after-tax return expectations), inflation, oil/dollar (although this worry has eased), the housing and credit markets and geopolitical risks all put pressure on stocks. We have rebounded more than 6% from the new low set on July 15, but credit spreads remain wide in most cases and until these narrow it will be tough for the market to sustain a rally in the near term. (Thankfully mid cap stocks are down just 5% and smalls are off by just 3.7% -- as measured by the Russell 2000 -- year-to-date)

The November election will also likely keep us in a trading range.

However, the election is just 70 days away, and if the outcome shows tax rates will not change for the worse this market will very likely rally in a significant way. From there it will take an end of the housing correction to get us back to all-time highs. For this all to play out it will take some time, but for now the market is expecting the worse and if that scenario doesn’t play out then things will be looking upbeat for stocks.

From a longer-term perspective, these tough markets create opportunities. Too, if some bad policy initiatives get implemented, it sets the stage for a pro-growth agenda – don’t forget House elections take place every two years. Patience is really the best prescription right now – without it, I think it is easy for people to make some poor decisions regarding longer-term portfolio performance.

We were without an economic release on Friday, so Bernanke’s speech was the big economic-related news of the day (you may remember we mentioned on Friday that the Fed Chairman would be speaking). Below are some key remarks from the speech and my analysis on each.

“In view of the weakening outlook and the downside risks to growth, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has maintained a relatively low target for the federal funds rate despite an increase in inflationary pressures.”

Comment:
This is a negative with regard to Fed credibility in the future – keeping fed funds this low even though inflationary pressures have increased?

“This strategy has been conditioned on our expectation that the prices of oil and other commodities would ultimately stabilize, in part as the result of slowing global growth, and that this outcome, together with well-anchored inflation expectations and increased slack in resource utilization, would foster a return to price stability in the medium run.”

Comment:
This is a full-fledged Keynesian view and one that history has proven is hardly a foregone conclusion. Further, inflation expectations are not well-anchored as a 20% year-over-year rise in import prices, a 10% year-over-year rise in producer prices, both large and small business surveys show price increases and plans to raise prices are at historic highs, core (ex-food and energy) intermediate goods have jumped 10.2% year-over-year and consumers believe prices will rise at 5-6% over the next year. (I don’t put a lot of faith in this consumer reading, but use it for purposes of illustration nonetheless.)

In addition, while the bond market has not priced in harmful levels of inflation – which is probably what the Fed is referring too when they state “inflation expectation are well-anchored” – we shouldn’t discount the fact that geopolitical and financial-sector risks have the market flooding to this safe-have, which has pushed yields lower. What’s more, there have been periods in the past when the bond market took some time to price in bouts with inflation, such as the mid 1970s even though CPI was hitting double-digit rates. If they are wrong, these yields will reflect the inflation problem soon enough.

That said, I do hope Bernanke and Co. are correct, it’s just that it doesn’t jibe with my study of the historic data. We shall see.

“In this regard, the recent decline in commodity prices, as well as the increased stability of the dollar, has been encouraging. If not reversed, these developments, together with a pace of growth that is likely to fall short of potential for a time, should lead inflation to moderate later this year and next year. Nevertheless, the inflation outlook remains highly uncertain, not least because of the difficulty of predicting the future course of commodity prices, and we will continue to monitor inflation and inflation expectations closely. The FOMC is committed to achieving medium-term price stability and will act as necessary to attain that objective.”

Comment:
Recall the chart we posted in Friday’s letter illustrating MZM money supply growth. Commodity prices could come down from these levels, but it is not clear to me that overall prices will fall to a level that comes even close to the Fed’s stated comfort zone. Money supply has grown at a rate that has surpassed nominal GDP growth by a long shot over the past 12 months. As Brian Wesbury laid out in a WSJ Op/Ed last week, this excess money creation has been absorbed to some degree by higher energy prices. If those prices fall, that money is still out there – without the necessary production of goods to mop it up. Therefore, demand for other goods may increase and push those prices higher.

Unfortunately, there is nothing in the Fed’s remarks that recognizes their easy money stance has contributed to the rise in commodity prices, nor is there a mention that this type of policy got us into the housing mess in the first place. (I’m not even going to expound on how this policy and the higher commodity prices that have resulted have contributed to Russia’s and Iran’s (oil-exporters) newfound chutzpah)

In the end, the Fed and government policy will choose the correct course – although possibly not before further mistakes are made. But for now things are quite uncertain; I’ll repeat, however, these types of environments do make for great opportunities. On interest rates, if longer-term rates shoot up (to reflect higher inflation expectations) it presents and opportunity to lock in at those higher rates (ala, those that still own 30-year T-bonds from say 1982 that yield 14% -- not saying things will get to that level, but you see the point). Further, stocks behave undesirably during these situations, as we have all seen. But valuations, even if uncertainty over inflation makes valuing equities more difficult, are set up for strong long-term performance and we believe this will pay off in a very nice way for those with patience over the next several years.

Have a great day!


Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst