.JPG)
Inside you will find:
- Market of stocks is presenting some great opportunities
- Inflation and how it has affected us
- Inside the Economy
- Inflation FAQs
- Equity Markets Activity
- Fixed Income Strategy
- New at Acropolis
- Ask Acropolis
- The Big Picture
Friday, July 10, 2009
July 2009 Portfolio Insights
Click here to read the latest issue of Portfolio Insights.
Inside you will find:
Inside you will find:
Daily Insight
U.S. stock indices ended higher on Thursday as the S&P 500 and NASDAQ Composite gained decent ground. The Dow average squeaked out a gain but was largely held back by shares of drug-makers JNJ, Merck and Pfizer.
Stocks began the session higher on news that Chinese auto sales surged 48% in June, another sign the country’s stimulus program has kicked overall economic activity higher (Chinese manufacturing has been in expansion mode for four months now). This has helped calm some concerns regarding global growth as the activity should help the entire Pacific Rim and may very well boost U.S. export activity, at least in the short term. By the end of the session, however, some of that momentum eased as the S&P 500 ended at about half of its intraday highpoint.
Basic material and energy stocks recouped some of the losses recorded over the prior four sessions, surely a result of that news out of China, and the financial sector was the best performer on the day after an analyst upgrade of Goldman Sachs pushed those shares higher.
Our own economic data releases offered little help as the latest look at same-store retail sales posted another big decline and continuing claims for unemployment benefits made a new high.
And speaking of jobless claims, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a boost in the duration of jobless benefits, again. Heck, many states have already extended benefits out to 46 weeks. Why not make it a full year? This is nuts and does nothing for future growth. Look, I know the whole countercyclical argument but enough is enough, this spending is going to end up weighing on the economy whenever it is a bounce does occur as Congress will jack up tax rates to pay for all of this.
Volume was weak with just 962 million shares traded on the NYSE Composite. Advancers just barely edged out decliners by a margin of nine-to-eight.
Market Activity for July 9, 2009
Jobless Claims
The Labor Department reported that initial jobless claims fell a large 52,000 in the week ended July 4 (keep that holiday in mind) to 565,000 from 617,000 in the week prior. This is the first move below the 600K level since January – a move we’ve been waiting for as evidence the labor market will markedly improve in the near future.
One only wishes it would have occurred during a full week – last week unemployment offices were open just four days due to the holiday as government offices were closed on Friday July 3. The seasonal adjustment on claims was also distorted due to the auto plant closings that occurred last month as a result of the bankruptcy filings of GM and Chrysler. Auto plants generally shut down in early July in order to retool for new models, but the claims that typically result were shifted to June due to auto-industry woes; this had an effect on the number, according to the Labor Department.
The four-week average of initial claims fell 10,000 to 606,000.
As evidence that the move in initial claims was due more to the holiday-shortened week and other distortions than an improvement within the labor market, continuing claims jumped 159,000 to set another new record at 6.883 million – this is unfortunate as claims had halted what was a 19-week march higher before easing in the prior three weeks.
The insured unemployment rate, the jobless rate for those eligible for benefits and a number that has historically tracked the direction of the overall unemployment rate, returned to 5.1% -- the figure has been wavering between 5.0% and 5.1% for several weeks now.
We’ll watch for next week’s data to get a better glimpse on initial claims, but it appears we’ll move back above that 600K level and the move may be abrupt as claims are likely pent up due to the office closings on July 3.
Wholesale Inventories
The Commerce Department reported that wholesale inventories fell less-than-expected in May, down 0.8% after an upwardly revised 1.3% decline for April. This gives us a sense of what next week’s business inventories number is going to post and since this latest look was pretty much in line with expectations the final Q1 GDP print will probably not be revised.
The sales data within the report posted a monthly increase of 0.2%; we’ve seen just two increases in merchant sales over the past 11 months. While it’s good to see a rise, and a trend higher is what we’re watching for, the May increase was completely due to higher energy prices as the ex-petro sales figure was down 0.3%.
We should see inventory rebuilding catalyze, even if it’s a mild boost, economic activity by the third quarter and when the ex-petro sales figure begins to rise…well, then we may be onto something.
Chain Store Sales
The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) released it same-store sales survey yesterday and reported that year-over-year results fell 4.6% in May. This marks the eight month of decline. While the overall reading is tough to gauge now since Wal-Mart halted monthly guidance, and as a result was removed from the overall ICSC index (it accounted for a huge percentage of the survey), the report is still helpful in offering a view within the various segments of the report.
All segments of the report, save drug stores, saw same-store sales decline. This is actually a bit worse than the April figures as drug and discount stores posted an increase in sales as compared to the year-ago period. Discount stores saw sales drop 3.5%; apparel-store sales fell 5.0%; department-store sales plunged 9.4%; luxury-store sales got clocked again, falling 18.1% -- this segment has been in a world of hurt, posting at least a 17% year-over-year decline in sales each month going back to October.
Comparisons are going to get incredibly easy for retail chains as we head into the fall, and this might be what it takes to halt this string of monthly declines – we’ll need easy comps as it will be a while before consumer activity begins a sustainable upswing as the labor market remains fragile and we have a negative wealth effect sapping consumer vitality, which is very evident within the luxury segment.
Have a great weekend!
Brent Vondera
Stocks began the session higher on news that Chinese auto sales surged 48% in June, another sign the country’s stimulus program has kicked overall economic activity higher (Chinese manufacturing has been in expansion mode for four months now). This has helped calm some concerns regarding global growth as the activity should help the entire Pacific Rim and may very well boost U.S. export activity, at least in the short term. By the end of the session, however, some of that momentum eased as the S&P 500 ended at about half of its intraday highpoint.
Basic material and energy stocks recouped some of the losses recorded over the prior four sessions, surely a result of that news out of China, and the financial sector was the best performer on the day after an analyst upgrade of Goldman Sachs pushed those shares higher.
Our own economic data releases offered little help as the latest look at same-store retail sales posted another big decline and continuing claims for unemployment benefits made a new high.
And speaking of jobless claims, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a boost in the duration of jobless benefits, again. Heck, many states have already extended benefits out to 46 weeks. Why not make it a full year? This is nuts and does nothing for future growth. Look, I know the whole countercyclical argument but enough is enough, this spending is going to end up weighing on the economy whenever it is a bounce does occur as Congress will jack up tax rates to pay for all of this.
Volume was weak with just 962 million shares traded on the NYSE Composite. Advancers just barely edged out decliners by a margin of nine-to-eight.
Market Activity for July 9, 2009
Jobless ClaimsThe Labor Department reported that initial jobless claims fell a large 52,000 in the week ended July 4 (keep that holiday in mind) to 565,000 from 617,000 in the week prior. This is the first move below the 600K level since January – a move we’ve been waiting for as evidence the labor market will markedly improve in the near future.
One only wishes it would have occurred during a full week – last week unemployment offices were open just four days due to the holiday as government offices were closed on Friday July 3. The seasonal adjustment on claims was also distorted due to the auto plant closings that occurred last month as a result of the bankruptcy filings of GM and Chrysler. Auto plants generally shut down in early July in order to retool for new models, but the claims that typically result were shifted to June due to auto-industry woes; this had an effect on the number, according to the Labor Department.
The four-week average of initial claims fell 10,000 to 606,000.
As evidence that the move in initial claims was due more to the holiday-shortened week and other distortions than an improvement within the labor market, continuing claims jumped 159,000 to set another new record at 6.883 million – this is unfortunate as claims had halted what was a 19-week march higher before easing in the prior three weeks.The insured unemployment rate, the jobless rate for those eligible for benefits and a number that has historically tracked the direction of the overall unemployment rate, returned to 5.1% -- the figure has been wavering between 5.0% and 5.1% for several weeks now.We’ll watch for next week’s data to get a better glimpse on initial claims, but it appears we’ll move back above that 600K level and the move may be abrupt as claims are likely pent up due to the office closings on July 3.Wholesale Inventories
The Commerce Department reported that wholesale inventories fell less-than-expected in May, down 0.8% after an upwardly revised 1.3% decline for April. This gives us a sense of what next week’s business inventories number is going to post and since this latest look was pretty much in line with expectations the final Q1 GDP print will probably not be revised.
The sales data within the report posted a monthly increase of 0.2%; we’ve seen just two increases in merchant sales over the past 11 months. While it’s good to see a rise, and a trend higher is what we’re watching for, the May increase was completely due to higher energy prices as the ex-petro sales figure was down 0.3%.
We should see inventory rebuilding catalyze, even if it’s a mild boost, economic activity by the third quarter and when the ex-petro sales figure begins to rise…well, then we may be onto something.
Chain Store Sales
The International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) released it same-store sales survey yesterday and reported that year-over-year results fell 4.6% in May. This marks the eight month of decline. While the overall reading is tough to gauge now since Wal-Mart halted monthly guidance, and as a result was removed from the overall ICSC index (it accounted for a huge percentage of the survey), the report is still helpful in offering a view within the various segments of the report.
All segments of the report, save drug stores, saw same-store sales decline. This is actually a bit worse than the April figures as drug and discount stores posted an increase in sales as compared to the year-ago period. Discount stores saw sales drop 3.5%; apparel-store sales fell 5.0%; department-store sales plunged 9.4%; luxury-store sales got clocked again, falling 18.1% -- this segment has been in a world of hurt, posting at least a 17% year-over-year decline in sales each month going back to October.
Comparisons are going to get incredibly easy for retail chains as we head into the fall, and this might be what it takes to halt this string of monthly declines – we’ll need easy comps as it will be a while before consumer activity begins a sustainable upswing as the labor market remains fragile and we have a negative wealth effect sapping consumer vitality, which is very evident within the luxury segment.
Have a great weekend!
Brent Vondera
Fixed Income Recap
Treasury yields climbed across the entire curve in Thursday’s trading. The thirty-year auction results were less than desirable, but Treasuries were struggling before stocks even opened so we can’t blame it all on supply. Profit taking after the recent rally is likely to blame for the selloff, considering stocks were mixed and the morning’s economic data, which included a new record on Continuing Jobless Claims, probably kept yields from rising even further if anything.
The $11 billion thirty-year reopening auction came in at 4.30%, two basis points higher than the market, and a bid/cover of 2.36 right at the four auction average. The bonds were issued at the high yields of the day as the 30-year rallied to 4.26% by the close of stocks, only to sell off again in the late afternoon.
As expected, England’s central bank left their version of the Fed Funds Target Rate unchanged but surprised the market when they left their commitments to purchase government debt, or queasing, unchanged at £125 billion, or $200 billion for those comparing it to our $1.25 trillion program. The market consensus was for the Bank of England to increase their purchases by £25 billion to £150 billion but the committee decided to stand pat and remarked that they will need only another month to complete the £15 billion or so they have left. In true major central bank fashion they were not explicit about any future increases, but similar actions coming from the U.S. Federal Reserve combined with the BOE’s actions yesterday may begin to reverse the market’s expectation for more quantitative easing globally.
The Fed lagged behind its usual pace for MBS purchases this week with only $17.05 in net purchases compared to their weekly average of $23.8 billion. The July 4th holiday translated into one less trading day during the period so that explains the lower number.
Cliff J. Reynolds Jr., Investment Analyst
The $11 billion thirty-year reopening auction came in at 4.30%, two basis points higher than the market, and a bid/cover of 2.36 right at the four auction average. The bonds were issued at the high yields of the day as the 30-year rallied to 4.26% by the close of stocks, only to sell off again in the late afternoon.
As expected, England’s central bank left their version of the Fed Funds Target Rate unchanged but surprised the market when they left their commitments to purchase government debt, or queasing, unchanged at £125 billion, or $200 billion for those comparing it to our $1.25 trillion program. The market consensus was for the Bank of England to increase their purchases by £25 billion to £150 billion but the committee decided to stand pat and remarked that they will need only another month to complete the £15 billion or so they have left. In true major central bank fashion they were not explicit about any future increases, but similar actions coming from the U.S. Federal Reserve combined with the BOE’s actions yesterday may begin to reverse the market’s expectation for more quantitative easing globally.
The Fed lagged behind its usual pace for MBS purchases this week with only $17.05 in net purchases compared to their weekly average of $23.8 billion. The July 4th holiday translated into one less trading day during the period so that explains the lower number.
Cliff J. Reynolds Jr., Investment Analyst
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Daily Insight
U.S. stocks ended mixed on Wednesday as the Dow and NASDAQ Composite closed slightly higher, while the broad S&P 500 was unable to make it back to the flat line. The major indices spent most of the day lower on concern second-quarter earnings season will disappoint investors, but erased those losses (nearly all of what was a 1.4% decline at its lowest point regarding the S&P 500) in the final hour of trading.
It appeared to be a better-than-expected consumer credit report for May, which was released around 2:00 CDT, that helped boost stocks late in the session. This is not normally a heavily-watched report but with consumer activity in the shape it is in, these readings garner increased attention. The report out of the Federal Reserve showed consumer credit shrank $3.2 billion at an annual rate; it was expected to drop by $8.8 billion. Revolving credit (such as credit cards), fell $2.9 billion, while non-revolving (such as car loans) came in essentially flat. The average maturity on car loans rose to 62.9 months and the loan-to-value increased to 93% in May. Yow!
Health-care and consumer-related shares helped to buoy stocks with their late-session surge. Financial shares weighed on the broad S&P 500 index – the sector, which makes up 13.2% of the index, lost 1.7% for the session.
More than two stocks fell for every one that rose on the NYSE Composite. Roughly 1.3 billion shares traded on the Big Board, about 7% below the three-month average – while relatively weak again, yesterday’s volume was the most in seven sessions.
Market Activity for July 8, 2009
Mortgage Applications
The Mortgage Bankers Association reported its mortgage apps index rose 10.9% for the week ended July 3 as refinancing activity jumped 15.2% and purchases rose 6.7% despite a 30-year fixed mortgage rate that held at 5.34% for a second week. (Just to explain to new readers, we do not view a 5.00% fixed rate as onerous per se, from a historical perspective this is super low as anything below 7.5% is viewed as very attractive from a long-term perspective. However these days people have become accustomed to view anything above 6.00% as high and with the job market in the shape it is in, we’ve seen it is rather unusual to see such a large increase in refis and purchases at a rate higher than 5.00%)
I can’t explain the jump in refis, maybe enough people who had been holding out for the long mortgage rates to come back below 5.00% threw in the towel and went for it. On the purchases side, it’s not quite as surprising as foreclosure-driven price declines have enticed buyers – average existing home prices are 25% off the peak hit in the summer of 2006.
Crude-Oil
Oil for August delivery fell for a sixth session, lower by 4.4% to $60.17 per barrel, as the latest Energy Department report showed fuel inventories rose more than expected. Crude is now down 17% from the recent intraday high of $73 touched on June 29.
While crude stockpiles fell 2.9 million barrels, gasoline inventories climbed 1.9 million barrels – more than twice the level expected -- and distillates (heating oil and diesel) rose 3.74 million – a gain of just 1.83 million barrels was expected. In addition, total U.S. daily fuel demand averaged 18.4 million barrels in the past month, down 5.9% form the year-ago period. Distillate consumption fell 12% to the lowest level since July 1999.
Just as the stimulus plans, with regard to both the U.S. and China, had helped foster the rise in energy prices, now that the economy is failing to show the improvement expected people are beginning to question the effectiveness of these plans. This is now moving crude in the opposite direction. And speaking of oil trading…
Increasing Regulations on Commodity Trading
The government will consider greater regulation over energy markets at hearings this month. Specifically, they want to weed out the “speculators” that drive prices higher. They leave out that this essential aspect of the market also drives prices lower at other points in time and is pretty important to the price discovery process.
The government seeks to reduce the use of commodity swaps, which are derivatives used to hedge positions. While regulators will surely allow large consumers (such and airlines and other transportation companies) and producers of energy to have nearly unlimited positions, they will go after the scapegoat of hedge funds and investment banks. When prices are rising, these are the easy targets and in this current environment of populism, the regulators will likely get their way in putting onerous restrictions on commodity trading for these players.
I would also point out that performance chasers are also a reason for spikes in commodity prices (such as all of those pension funds that jumped into the energy market last summer), but that doesn’t exactly make them rogue traders. Further, a burdensome regulatory regime will drive participants out of the market and less liquidity doesn’t exactly make for a better pricing mechanism – the swings could be more dramatic than would otherwise be the case. Ah, the world of unintended consequences.
It’s always easy for politicians to point the finger at others, even when it is the ignorance and short-sighted nature of Washington that causes most of society’s problems. I wish more people would consider that it just may be reckless and insensible policy that causes traders to make the bets they do. When supplies are tight, demand is strong and energy policy is ignorant of geopolitical realities, just maybe the market is simply adjusting to the situations in place at any given moment in time. Just as politicians fail to realize how utterly stupid it sounds to call for less foreign dependence on energy, while simultaneously restricting the production of domestic energy, they also fail to look inward. All the regulations in the world can’t stop poor policy decisions from causing adverse consequences for the consumer and the country in general.
So go ahead with your regulatory regime, you geniuses of how the world works. You still won’t be able to stop energy prices from adjusting to mistaken policy decisions; you won’t be able stop traders from expecting commodity prices to rise and then jumping onto that train when you signal hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure spending is coming; you won’t be able to stop foreign governments from buying up commodities (thus pushing the prices higher) as a way to hedge against the falling value of their dollar positions – unless, of course, we bring back price controls, but then shortages ensue. Say hello to That ‘70s Show! Eventually though, quixotic notions run into the brick wall of reality. We’ve learned these lessons; apparently we need to be taught again. Oh, joy.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera
It appeared to be a better-than-expected consumer credit report for May, which was released around 2:00 CDT, that helped boost stocks late in the session. This is not normally a heavily-watched report but with consumer activity in the shape it is in, these readings garner increased attention. The report out of the Federal Reserve showed consumer credit shrank $3.2 billion at an annual rate; it was expected to drop by $8.8 billion. Revolving credit (such as credit cards), fell $2.9 billion, while non-revolving (such as car loans) came in essentially flat. The average maturity on car loans rose to 62.9 months and the loan-to-value increased to 93% in May. Yow!
Health-care and consumer-related shares helped to buoy stocks with their late-session surge. Financial shares weighed on the broad S&P 500 index – the sector, which makes up 13.2% of the index, lost 1.7% for the session.
More than two stocks fell for every one that rose on the NYSE Composite. Roughly 1.3 billion shares traded on the Big Board, about 7% below the three-month average – while relatively weak again, yesterday’s volume was the most in seven sessions.
Market Activity for July 8, 2009
Mortgage ApplicationsThe Mortgage Bankers Association reported its mortgage apps index rose 10.9% for the week ended July 3 as refinancing activity jumped 15.2% and purchases rose 6.7% despite a 30-year fixed mortgage rate that held at 5.34% for a second week. (Just to explain to new readers, we do not view a 5.00% fixed rate as onerous per se, from a historical perspective this is super low as anything below 7.5% is viewed as very attractive from a long-term perspective. However these days people have become accustomed to view anything above 6.00% as high and with the job market in the shape it is in, we’ve seen it is rather unusual to see such a large increase in refis and purchases at a rate higher than 5.00%)
I can’t explain the jump in refis, maybe enough people who had been holding out for the long mortgage rates to come back below 5.00% threw in the towel and went for it. On the purchases side, it’s not quite as surprising as foreclosure-driven price declines have enticed buyers – average existing home prices are 25% off the peak hit in the summer of 2006.
Crude-OilOil for August delivery fell for a sixth session, lower by 4.4% to $60.17 per barrel, as the latest Energy Department report showed fuel inventories rose more than expected. Crude is now down 17% from the recent intraday high of $73 touched on June 29.
While crude stockpiles fell 2.9 million barrels, gasoline inventories climbed 1.9 million barrels – more than twice the level expected -- and distillates (heating oil and diesel) rose 3.74 million – a gain of just 1.83 million barrels was expected. In addition, total U.S. daily fuel demand averaged 18.4 million barrels in the past month, down 5.9% form the year-ago period. Distillate consumption fell 12% to the lowest level since July 1999.Just as the stimulus plans, with regard to both the U.S. and China, had helped foster the rise in energy prices, now that the economy is failing to show the improvement expected people are beginning to question the effectiveness of these plans. This is now moving crude in the opposite direction. And speaking of oil trading…
Increasing Regulations on Commodity Trading
The government will consider greater regulation over energy markets at hearings this month. Specifically, they want to weed out the “speculators” that drive prices higher. They leave out that this essential aspect of the market also drives prices lower at other points in time and is pretty important to the price discovery process.
The government seeks to reduce the use of commodity swaps, which are derivatives used to hedge positions. While regulators will surely allow large consumers (such and airlines and other transportation companies) and producers of energy to have nearly unlimited positions, they will go after the scapegoat of hedge funds and investment banks. When prices are rising, these are the easy targets and in this current environment of populism, the regulators will likely get their way in putting onerous restrictions on commodity trading for these players.
I would also point out that performance chasers are also a reason for spikes in commodity prices (such as all of those pension funds that jumped into the energy market last summer), but that doesn’t exactly make them rogue traders. Further, a burdensome regulatory regime will drive participants out of the market and less liquidity doesn’t exactly make for a better pricing mechanism – the swings could be more dramatic than would otherwise be the case. Ah, the world of unintended consequences.
It’s always easy for politicians to point the finger at others, even when it is the ignorance and short-sighted nature of Washington that causes most of society’s problems. I wish more people would consider that it just may be reckless and insensible policy that causes traders to make the bets they do. When supplies are tight, demand is strong and energy policy is ignorant of geopolitical realities, just maybe the market is simply adjusting to the situations in place at any given moment in time. Just as politicians fail to realize how utterly stupid it sounds to call for less foreign dependence on energy, while simultaneously restricting the production of domestic energy, they also fail to look inward. All the regulations in the world can’t stop poor policy decisions from causing adverse consequences for the consumer and the country in general.
So go ahead with your regulatory regime, you geniuses of how the world works. You still won’t be able to stop energy prices from adjusting to mistaken policy decisions; you won’t be able stop traders from expecting commodity prices to rise and then jumping onto that train when you signal hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure spending is coming; you won’t be able to stop foreign governments from buying up commodities (thus pushing the prices higher) as a way to hedge against the falling value of their dollar positions – unless, of course, we bring back price controls, but then shortages ensue. Say hello to That ‘70s Show! Eventually though, quixotic notions run into the brick wall of reality. We’ve learned these lessons; apparently we need to be taught again. Oh, joy.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera
Fixed Income Recap
If you never had a reason to check the blog out before you surely do now. Minjung made her first post yesterday. Check it out!! WAG raises dividend 22%
The Treasury rally ran right through yesterday’s ten year auction as rumors that foreign central banks may step back from the longer auctions never materialized. I know the table has all the details but some parts deserve highlighting. The impressive outperformance of the long end despite the ten-year supply led to a 9 basis point curve flattening that was the biggest move flatter since June 5. One must begin to think about mortgage rates dipping again. The last time the ten-year was at 3.30% the 30-year fixed was 4.81%, (currently 5.34%). The market can definitely take the origination, thanks to the Fed averaging over $4BB in MBS purchases each day, so it seems like many of the pieces are in place for rates to move closer to their lows from this spring. The ten-year however, is probably going to need to hold a sub-3.50% level for more than just a few days in order to lower mortgage rates and with this volatility calling that would be impossible.
The $19 billion ten-year auction was “out of this world strong” with a bid/cover of 3.28 much higher than the 2.72 four auction average. After announcing that they would sell $19BB in ten-year notes the Treasury received $62.4BB in bids!! Who’s thinking the dollar is junk now? That is some strong demand, and the fact that it came 3.5 basis points tighter than the market right before the auction also bodes very well for supply concerns into the future.
Some are calling the recent demand for Treasuries simply part of the negative repo dynamic in the market currently. I won’t get into the technicals of the problem but it is resulting from a new rule implemented by SIFMA that forces participants who are failing to deliver a Treasury security to their counterparty in a trade to pay penalties. It is creating more demand for the securities than their previously was because before May of this year there was no explicit cost of failing. This is an interesting dynamic, but to say it is a major contributor to the recent Treasury rally is going a little far in my view.
Cliff J. Reynolds Jr., Investment Analyst
The Treasury rally ran right through yesterday’s ten year auction as rumors that foreign central banks may step back from the longer auctions never materialized. I know the table has all the details but some parts deserve highlighting. The impressive outperformance of the long end despite the ten-year supply led to a 9 basis point curve flattening that was the biggest move flatter since June 5. One must begin to think about mortgage rates dipping again. The last time the ten-year was at 3.30% the 30-year fixed was 4.81%, (currently 5.34%). The market can definitely take the origination, thanks to the Fed averaging over $4BB in MBS purchases each day, so it seems like many of the pieces are in place for rates to move closer to their lows from this spring. The ten-year however, is probably going to need to hold a sub-3.50% level for more than just a few days in order to lower mortgage rates and with this volatility calling that would be impossible.
The $19 billion ten-year auction was “out of this world strong” with a bid/cover of 3.28 much higher than the 2.72 four auction average. After announcing that they would sell $19BB in ten-year notes the Treasury received $62.4BB in bids!! Who’s thinking the dollar is junk now? That is some strong demand, and the fact that it came 3.5 basis points tighter than the market right before the auction also bodes very well for supply concerns into the future.
Some are calling the recent demand for Treasuries simply part of the negative repo dynamic in the market currently. I won’t get into the technicals of the problem but it is resulting from a new rule implemented by SIFMA that forces participants who are failing to deliver a Treasury security to their counterparty in a trade to pay penalties. It is creating more demand for the securities than their previously was because before May of this year there was no explicit cost of failing. This is an interesting dynamic, but to say it is a major contributor to the recent Treasury rally is going a little far in my view.
Cliff J. Reynolds Jr., Investment Analyst
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
WAG raises dividend 22%
Walgreen Company’s (WAG) board of directors today announced a 22% increase in the quarterly dividend to 13.75 cents a share from 11.25 cents a share. This marks 34 consecutive years of dividend increases in Walgreen's 76 years of dividend payment history.
This will put WAG’s payout ratio at about 26%, which is a slight increased from 21% previous quarter, while holding the income before extra ordinary items constant.In an environment where we mostly hear about dividend cuts, this news was welcomed by investors, and WAG finished up 3.12% for the day (and is trading as much as 0.8% up in after market trading).
WAG is weathering the storm relatively well, even though we've seen recent earnings number slightly miss the expectation. (See Peter's post for recent earnings release: http://acrinv.blogspot.com/2009/06/walgreen-wag-trades-lower-after.html)
By slowing down new store openings, rejuvenating existing stores, and focusing on inventory control, WAG’s is making an effort to reduce costs during a period of depressed consumer spending and setting itself up for stronger turnaround. WAG's main line of businesses, prescription drugs and consumer staple items, are also a better positioned area to hold up well during downturn.
Minjung Son
This will put WAG’s payout ratio at about 26%, which is a slight increased from 21% previous quarter, while holding the income before extra ordinary items constant.In an environment where we mostly hear about dividend cuts, this news was welcomed by investors, and WAG finished up 3.12% for the day (and is trading as much as 0.8% up in after market trading).
WAG is weathering the storm relatively well, even though we've seen recent earnings number slightly miss the expectation. (See Peter's post for recent earnings release: http://acrinv.blogspot.com/2009/06/walgreen-wag-trades-lower-after.html)
By slowing down new store openings, rejuvenating existing stores, and focusing on inventory control, WAG’s is making an effort to reduce costs during a period of depressed consumer spending and setting itself up for stronger turnaround. WAG's main line of businesses, prescription drugs and consumer staple items, are also a better positioned area to hold up well during downturn.
Minjung Son
Amgen (AMGN) set for a big day
Shares of Amgen (AMGN) are flying higher in response to a Phase 3 trial of experimental drug denosumab, a bone strengthening medicine, worked better than a potential rival (Novartis’ Zometa) in reducing or delaying bone problems in breast cancer patients. This study only increases the likelihood that denosumab will reach blockbuster status – a “blockbuster drug” is one that generates at least $1 billion in annual sales.
Amgen expects a decision from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on whether it can sell denosumab for osteoporosis by October 19. Amgen is also studying denosumab to see if it can prevent serious fractures and other damage that frequently occurs in patients with cancer that has spread to the bones.
Amgen currently has five blockbuster drugs, which helped push global sales to $15 billion in 2008. Still, a potential blockbuster like denosumab that could eventually generate $2 billion to $3 billion of annual revenues, could help take the pressure off Amgen’s other drugs, which are facing higher scrutiny from the FDA as well as increased competition from both branded and biosimilar (generic biologic) drugs.
--
Peter J. Lazaroff
Amgen expects a decision from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on whether it can sell denosumab for osteoporosis by October 19. Amgen is also studying denosumab to see if it can prevent serious fractures and other damage that frequently occurs in patients with cancer that has spread to the bones.
Amgen currently has five blockbuster drugs, which helped push global sales to $15 billion in 2008. Still, a potential blockbuster like denosumab that could eventually generate $2 billion to $3 billion of annual revenues, could help take the pressure off Amgen’s other drugs, which are facing higher scrutiny from the FDA as well as increased competition from both branded and biosimilar (generic biologic) drugs.
--
Peter J. Lazaroff
Daily Insight
U.S. stocks fell for a second session in three as the S&P 500 flirted with 880 but was able to hold above what many technicians (for what it is worth) see as the current key level. The broad market first crashed below 880, regarding the post credit-crisis period, on October 24.
The onus has shifted to the bulls to make the case that higher levels are justified as the market has clearly cast aside the “green shoots” and “second derivative” arguments and wants results. While a number of data sets have shown we’ve progressed from deep recession to something that reflects a more normal downturn, the labor market figures are ugly and suggest consumer activity isn’t going to be much help, and is more likely to work as a drag on the economy, for some time to come.
The most economically sensitive sectors led the market lower. Industrials held the position of the worst-performing sector and consumer discretionary, tech, basic material and energy shares also took a beating.
Volume was 25% below the three-month daily average on the NYSE Composite – outside of two sessions when volume popped above two billion shares, volume has been at least 20% below the YTD average for over a month now.
Market Activity for July 7, 2009
Earnings Season and the Economy (and what we may expect a few quarters out)
Investors will partially shift their focus from the economic releases to the earnings front as Alcoa assumes the traditional role of kicking off the season after the bell today -- although, not really getting started in earnest until later next week. The consensus estimate is for S&P 500 earnings to decline 34% from the year-ago period, which follows a 60% decline in the previous quarter. Earnings results are expected to decline 20% in Q3 and post the first positive results in two years by Q4.
The results will receive a pass during the current season with regard to the degree that cost-cutting plays a role. That is, if overall profits beat expectations largely due to the slash and burn that has occurred within the labor market, investors will accept that but not beyond this period. When third-quarter season rolls around investors will want to see some improvement in sales, some sign that demand has bounced. (The same is true for GDP. We expect a rebound that pushes GDP to post positive results by the third and fourth quarters simply because of the inventory dynamic, but if final sales fail to rebound as well, the market is going to become very concerned)
As is the consensus estimate, we also believe profit results will post positive results by Q4 as the year-ago comparables will be relatively easy to beat and the massive reduction in expenses allows for the potential for big profit growth a couple of quarters thereafter.
The concern that I believe is the issue is that this bounce, whenever it occurs, will be transitory in nature, not the typical rebound that lasts for several years. This is not the normal downturn, it is not a situation in which the Fed cut growth off by raising interest rates as they feared inflation would run to harmful levels – hence all you have to worry about is the scale down in stockpiles. Instead, it was a very large credit event that put us in this situation and this takes additional time to work through; one cannot expect consumer activity to lead GDP higher as debt levels are too burdensome and businesses are unlikely to grow payrolls along the typical expansionary timeline.
What’s more, firms may be faced with significantly higher commodity prices a few quarters out and deal with a margin squeeze as a result. (We see a lot of people talking about how consumer staple stocks are the place to be over the next few years as their higher dividend yields and steady, albeit low, earnings growth makes this area a safe play. Problem is, these are the names hit the hardest by rising input costs). This is one of the downsides to the massive global stimulus plans as large infrastructure projects means big demand for commodities, and that is essentially what will drive those prices higher. In addition, the very large (and unprecedented post-WWII era) deficits and aggressive monetary easing may encourage foreign governments to buy up commodities as a dollar hedge, driving those prices even higher. I do not see how the dollar holds up, even at these levels, based on the policy that is in place.
These are all things to think about as we look out over the next couple of years -- specifically the 18-24 month timeframe. I can see euphoria rising a couple of quarters out as an economic snapback ensues, likely helped in some manner by government stimulus plans and certainly by that inventory dynamic. Even if this rebound is not substantial, people will get excited simply because these will be the first readings of increase in a year.
But the way the U.S., and many parts of the globe, are combating this economic weakness is very short term in nature (short-sighted thinking), and along with separate policy agendas have ramifications for the economy a few quarters out – ie. dollar weakness and higher commodity prices, higher tax rates at exactly the wrong time (if there is ever a right time), energy policy that fails to acknowledge geopolitical realities, and an overall massive increase in government involvement that is never conducive to growth and .
Now we’re hearing increased calls among policymakers for another stimulus package even before this nearly trillion-dollar behemoth is off the ground. What we need is for government to get out of the way; alas that is not going to happen, lets’ face it.
In summary, the euphoria that is likely to ensue when GDP posts its first positive readings after the longest stretch of economic decline in the post-WWII era, and profits in the black for the first time in two years, should be held in check even if it will be difficult (and remember I’m looking ahead here a bit, for now we’re dealing with a market correction off of the 42% march that brought us to 946 on S&P 500 from the nefarious 666 low). We will remain in a rather precarious situation for some time and corralling emotions when stocks move to the next upswing in what may prove to be a long-dated trading range will take discipline. Don’t chase the high end for fear you’re missing out. Be patient and buy on the weakness.
We were without an economic release yesterday and today is another quiet one on this front. Tomorrow we’ll get back to it with jobless claims and wholesale inventories.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera
The onus has shifted to the bulls to make the case that higher levels are justified as the market has clearly cast aside the “green shoots” and “second derivative” arguments and wants results. While a number of data sets have shown we’ve progressed from deep recession to something that reflects a more normal downturn, the labor market figures are ugly and suggest consumer activity isn’t going to be much help, and is more likely to work as a drag on the economy, for some time to come.
The most economically sensitive sectors led the market lower. Industrials held the position of the worst-performing sector and consumer discretionary, tech, basic material and energy shares also took a beating.
Volume was 25% below the three-month daily average on the NYSE Composite – outside of two sessions when volume popped above two billion shares, volume has been at least 20% below the YTD average for over a month now.
Market Activity for July 7, 2009
Earnings Season and the Economy (and what we may expect a few quarters out)Investors will partially shift their focus from the economic releases to the earnings front as Alcoa assumes the traditional role of kicking off the season after the bell today -- although, not really getting started in earnest until later next week. The consensus estimate is for S&P 500 earnings to decline 34% from the year-ago period, which follows a 60% decline in the previous quarter. Earnings results are expected to decline 20% in Q3 and post the first positive results in two years by Q4.
The results will receive a pass during the current season with regard to the degree that cost-cutting plays a role. That is, if overall profits beat expectations largely due to the slash and burn that has occurred within the labor market, investors will accept that but not beyond this period. When third-quarter season rolls around investors will want to see some improvement in sales, some sign that demand has bounced. (The same is true for GDP. We expect a rebound that pushes GDP to post positive results by the third and fourth quarters simply because of the inventory dynamic, but if final sales fail to rebound as well, the market is going to become very concerned)
As is the consensus estimate, we also believe profit results will post positive results by Q4 as the year-ago comparables will be relatively easy to beat and the massive reduction in expenses allows for the potential for big profit growth a couple of quarters thereafter.
The concern that I believe is the issue is that this bounce, whenever it occurs, will be transitory in nature, not the typical rebound that lasts for several years. This is not the normal downturn, it is not a situation in which the Fed cut growth off by raising interest rates as they feared inflation would run to harmful levels – hence all you have to worry about is the scale down in stockpiles. Instead, it was a very large credit event that put us in this situation and this takes additional time to work through; one cannot expect consumer activity to lead GDP higher as debt levels are too burdensome and businesses are unlikely to grow payrolls along the typical expansionary timeline.
What’s more, firms may be faced with significantly higher commodity prices a few quarters out and deal with a margin squeeze as a result. (We see a lot of people talking about how consumer staple stocks are the place to be over the next few years as their higher dividend yields and steady, albeit low, earnings growth makes this area a safe play. Problem is, these are the names hit the hardest by rising input costs). This is one of the downsides to the massive global stimulus plans as large infrastructure projects means big demand for commodities, and that is essentially what will drive those prices higher. In addition, the very large (and unprecedented post-WWII era) deficits and aggressive monetary easing may encourage foreign governments to buy up commodities as a dollar hedge, driving those prices even higher. I do not see how the dollar holds up, even at these levels, based on the policy that is in place.
These are all things to think about as we look out over the next couple of years -- specifically the 18-24 month timeframe. I can see euphoria rising a couple of quarters out as an economic snapback ensues, likely helped in some manner by government stimulus plans and certainly by that inventory dynamic. Even if this rebound is not substantial, people will get excited simply because these will be the first readings of increase in a year.
But the way the U.S., and many parts of the globe, are combating this economic weakness is very short term in nature (short-sighted thinking), and along with separate policy agendas have ramifications for the economy a few quarters out – ie. dollar weakness and higher commodity prices, higher tax rates at exactly the wrong time (if there is ever a right time), energy policy that fails to acknowledge geopolitical realities, and an overall massive increase in government involvement that is never conducive to growth and .
Now we’re hearing increased calls among policymakers for another stimulus package even before this nearly trillion-dollar behemoth is off the ground. What we need is for government to get out of the way; alas that is not going to happen, lets’ face it.
In summary, the euphoria that is likely to ensue when GDP posts its first positive readings after the longest stretch of economic decline in the post-WWII era, and profits in the black for the first time in two years, should be held in check even if it will be difficult (and remember I’m looking ahead here a bit, for now we’re dealing with a market correction off of the 42% march that brought us to 946 on S&P 500 from the nefarious 666 low). We will remain in a rather precarious situation for some time and corralling emotions when stocks move to the next upswing in what may prove to be a long-dated trading range will take discipline. Don’t chase the high end for fear you’re missing out. Be patient and buy on the weakness.
We were without an economic release yesterday and today is another quiet one on this front. Tomorrow we’ll get back to it with jobless claims and wholesale inventories.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera
Fixed Income Recap
Treasuries were mixed as the curve flattened due to a two-year selloff even though one-year bills and three year notes rallied on the day. Economic data has been light this week so many in the market are concentrating on earnings season that is right around the corner.
My comments yesterday about Treasuries looking rich with the ten-year at 3.55%, (which rallied to 3.48% yesterday… whoops!), will be truly tested today with the Treasury auctioning $19 billion in a ten-year note reopening. There is some chatter about foreign central banks, who are by nature heavy buyers on the short end of the curve, creating some problems for the Treasury by stepping even farther away from the longer duration auctions in favor of the shorter end of the curve. We will see if there is much truth to the rumors when we receive today’s results.
The $35 billion dollar three-year auction was stronger than expected and helped fuel most Treasuries higher for the day. The notes were sold at yield of 1.519% with a bid/cover ratio of 2.62, right at the four week average. Just over half of notes sold went to indirect bidders, a group of buyers that includes foreign central banks.
Cliff J. Reynolds Jr.
My comments yesterday about Treasuries looking rich with the ten-year at 3.55%, (which rallied to 3.48% yesterday… whoops!), will be truly tested today with the Treasury auctioning $19 billion in a ten-year note reopening. There is some chatter about foreign central banks, who are by nature heavy buyers on the short end of the curve, creating some problems for the Treasury by stepping even farther away from the longer duration auctions in favor of the shorter end of the curve. We will see if there is much truth to the rumors when we receive today’s results.
The $35 billion dollar three-year auction was stronger than expected and helped fuel most Treasuries higher for the day. The notes were sold at yield of 1.519% with a bid/cover ratio of 2.62, right at the four week average. Just over half of notes sold went to indirect bidders, a group of buyers that includes foreign central banks.
Cliff J. Reynolds Jr.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Finance arm still weighing on General Electric (GE)
After reading about GE Capital’s Political Minefield in today’s Wall Street Journal, I went back and looked at some of my commentary on General Electric (GE) from earlier in the year.
In this post on March 3, I suggested that the GE was oversold. Most of my reasoning was based on the fact that everyone was forgetting about the company’s industrial business and only focusing on GE Capital. Only a few weeks later I posted in my March 19 note:
“Investors have become somewhat single-minded in their focus on GE Capital as they fear the unit’s $637 billion balance sheet (as of 12/31/08) is full of souring assets like commercial real estate loans and securities that make the unit and its parent vulnerable to future losses.”
While I was correct that GE didn’t face the threat of nationalization like other U.S. bank holding companies, it never occurred to me that the government may alter the way GE Capital is classified and, thus, change the rules of the game – although considering how often the government changed the rules throughout the financial crisis, I am not really surprised.
After steadily climbing from its lows, GE’s stock price did a U-turn after Obama administration issued their proposal for reforming the U.S. financial system. The declines were a result of investors’ refocusing attention towards GE Capital – and for good reason.
GE Capital is one of the world’s largest and most diverse financial operations. If GE Capital were classified as a bank holding company, then it would be the nation’s seventh largest by assets. While GE has benefited from more relaxed regulation than bank holding companies, the reform proposal could lead to GE Capital being classified as a “Tier 1,” or systemically important bank. In this case, GE Capital would be subjected to tighter regulation, higher capital ratios, and bigger loan-loss reserves. And any increased restrictions on the industrial activities could very well lead to a spin-off of GE Capital from its parent company.
A break-up, however, causes a few problems and makes the finance business worth less to GE shareholders than the value it provides as part of GE as a whole. First, GE Capital would almost certainly have its credit rating downgraded without the financial safety net of its former parent company. Consequently, large collateral calls would be triggered in response to a GE Capital credit downgrade.
Second, the company would almost certainly need to raise capital to enhance its Tier 1 ratio and bolster its loan-loss reserves, both of which are well below the largest four U.S. banks. Even more, GE Capital could be forced to reduce assets like their $36 billion in real-estate equity investments, which banks are typically not allowed to hold, at “below-value” prices and resulting in large losses.
It’s easy to see why shareholders consider GE Capital a more valuable business when combined with the parent company than on its own. GE shareholders who would likely receive shares of a spun-off GE Capital would likely see negative earnings as the company adjusted to new regulatory requirements and may also see their shares diluted if GE Capital taps the equity market for fresh capital.
Despite all of these concerns, I wouldn’t be hurrying to shed your GE shares. Although there is less upside for the shares than there was in early March, GE is trading at a fairly reasonable valuation and still offers a great value for the long-term investor.
--
Peter J. Lazaroff
In this post on March 3, I suggested that the GE was oversold. Most of my reasoning was based on the fact that everyone was forgetting about the company’s industrial business and only focusing on GE Capital. Only a few weeks later I posted in my March 19 note:
“Investors have become somewhat single-minded in their focus on GE Capital as they fear the unit’s $637 billion balance sheet (as of 12/31/08) is full of souring assets like commercial real estate loans and securities that make the unit and its parent vulnerable to future losses.”
While I was correct that GE didn’t face the threat of nationalization like other U.S. bank holding companies, it never occurred to me that the government may alter the way GE Capital is classified and, thus, change the rules of the game – although considering how often the government changed the rules throughout the financial crisis, I am not really surprised.
After steadily climbing from its lows, GE’s stock price did a U-turn after Obama administration issued their proposal for reforming the U.S. financial system. The declines were a result of investors’ refocusing attention towards GE Capital – and for good reason.
GE Capital is one of the world’s largest and most diverse financial operations. If GE Capital were classified as a bank holding company, then it would be the nation’s seventh largest by assets. While GE has benefited from more relaxed regulation than bank holding companies, the reform proposal could lead to GE Capital being classified as a “Tier 1,” or systemically important bank. In this case, GE Capital would be subjected to tighter regulation, higher capital ratios, and bigger loan-loss reserves. And any increased restrictions on the industrial activities could very well lead to a spin-off of GE Capital from its parent company.
A break-up, however, causes a few problems and makes the finance business worth less to GE shareholders than the value it provides as part of GE as a whole. First, GE Capital would almost certainly have its credit rating downgraded without the financial safety net of its former parent company. Consequently, large collateral calls would be triggered in response to a GE Capital credit downgrade.
Second, the company would almost certainly need to raise capital to enhance its Tier 1 ratio and bolster its loan-loss reserves, both of which are well below the largest four U.S. banks. Even more, GE Capital could be forced to reduce assets like their $36 billion in real-estate equity investments, which banks are typically not allowed to hold, at “below-value” prices and resulting in large losses.
It’s easy to see why shareholders consider GE Capital a more valuable business when combined with the parent company than on its own. GE shareholders who would likely receive shares of a spun-off GE Capital would likely see negative earnings as the company adjusted to new regulatory requirements and may also see their shares diluted if GE Capital taps the equity market for fresh capital.
Despite all of these concerns, I wouldn’t be hurrying to shed your GE shares. Although there is less upside for the shares than there was in early March, GE is trading at a fairly reasonable valuation and still offers a great value for the long-term investor.
--
Peter J. Lazaroff
Fixed Income Recap
The curve steepened again yesterday to +256 as short term yields fell for the fourth trading day in a row. That’s fourteen out of the last sixteen for those keeping track. Bonds shrugged off a better than expected ISM number and a stronger stock market and rallied anyway. Even more impressive is they are rallying ahead of a week of relatively heavy supply. Like I said in yesterday’s recap, the $73 billion in supply this week is far from the $100+ billion weeks we have gotten used to lately, but with bonds being auctioned on 4 days this week for the first time since the Treasury began regularly issuing bonds, it’s a hurdle nonetheless. Treasuries look a little overbought, especially on the short end in my opinion.
Yesterday’s TIPS auction kicked off this week’s supply schedule and went off without a hitch. The bid/cover ratio, a measure of demand for Treasuries, was a healthy 2.51, higher than the 2.37 average for the previous four auctions. Today we will get $35 billion in new three-year notes, an area of the curve that has had a very strong past couple weeks. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a pullback in prices, (higher yields), come with the supply today.
Cliff J. Reynolds Jr.
Yesterday’s TIPS auction kicked off this week’s supply schedule and went off without a hitch. The bid/cover ratio, a measure of demand for Treasuries, was a healthy 2.51, higher than the 2.37 average for the previous four auctions. Today we will get $35 billion in new three-year notes, an area of the curve that has had a very strong past couple weeks. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a pullback in prices, (higher yields), come with the supply today.
Cliff J. Reynolds Jr.
Daily Insight
U.S. stocks ended mixed on Monday (I think I have my days right now) as the Dow and S&P 500 gained ground, while the NASDAQ Composite was held back by a decline in technology shares. A better-than-expected reading on service-sector activity for June helped buoy the market.
After spending nearly the entire session in the red, the broad market (as measured by the S&P 500) rallied in the final minutes of trading to close above the day’s opening price. Market weakness just prior to the release of the day’s sole economic reading suggested things were going to get ugly if that number was to miss the expectation; when it beat, most stock prices began to slowly improve and picked up steam in the final half hour.
The traditional areas of safety, consumer staples, utilities and health-care shares were among yesterday’s top performers. Energy, basic materials and tech were the biggest losers. We talked about the likelihood of sector rotation taking place a couple of weeks back, out of the reflation trade of oil and basic material shares and into consumer staples, health-care and utilities. We’ll see if this move has some legs this time.
Volume remained weak on Monday as just 1.1 billion shares traded on the NYSE Composite, 21% below the three-month average. Ten shares fell for every seven that rose on the Big Board.
Market Activity for July 6, 2009
Crude-Oil
Crude for August delivery continues to pull back after its steep 70% run up from $34 to $73 that occurred in just four months. Oil continues to trade on prospects for GDP, and with concerns that the economic rebound may be delayed (at least in terms of the recent consensus estimate) its moving lower again, down 4% on Monday to $64 per barrel. Of course, some of this is just natural profit taking after such a powerful move higher.
I’m not even going to try to guess where crude goes from here. Supply/demand fundamentals probably don’t justify a price higher than $50-55 per barrel, but we’ve got massive deficits and very easy monetary policy to think about. These policies should affect the dollar’s value over time, pushing it lower, and this will have the opposite result on commodity prices. If the dollar does trend lower over the next couple of years, one wonders if what has become the anti-dollar trade (the euro) will continue as the Eurozone is going be burdened with lackluster growth prospects for some time. This means the commodity play may work as the anti-dollar trade for the next 18-24 months and that means higher oil prices, but probably not before an additional pullback as is typically the case after surges, such as the one we’ve seen over the past three months.
ISM Service Sector
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) service-sector gauge continued to show improvement as the reading for June came in at a better-than-expected 47.0 – three percentage points higher than the May reading of 44.0 and a pretty darned good number considering the state of things.
While a reading below 50 suggests the service sector remains in contraction mode (for the ninth-straight month now), continued improvement is obviously a good sign but like so many data releases these days there’s always something that diminishes an attempt at relative optimism. Six of the 18 industries the index covers reported business grew in June, which is unchanged from May and down from seven in April. One would certainly want to see a steady trend of improvement here.
This headline reading of 47.0 is a composite of several sub indices: business activity, new orders, prices and employment. These individual indices are important to also view separately as a gauge of where things are going from here.
The business activity reading came closer to hitting 50 than anytime since the economic world changed in September, posting a reading of 49.8 after the 42.4 in May.
New orders, one of the best indicators of future activity, hit 48.6 after posting 44.4 (and a drop from the April reading) in May.
The employment index rose to 43.4 in June from 39.0 in May. Five industries reported an increase in employment (Real Estate, Rental & Leasing, Entertainment & Leisure, Agriculture and Forestry), eight reported a decrease and four reported no change.
The prices paid index moved above 50 for the first time since October, hitting 53.7 – this may be something to watch. We’re far from the level of 80 hit when last summer’s commodity spike pushed the CPI to 5.6% on a year-over-year basis, but I don’t think it will take much to juice prices again, and the ISM prices paid figures will be a key number to watch.
The inventory sentiment reading jumped to 67.0 from 62.5, which means more industries view their level of stockpiles are too high at this time – this reading likely completely offsets the improved reading in the new orders index; with respect to the outlook for the next couple of headline ISM readings. If firms continue to believe inventories are too high, it’s tough to make the argument that new orders will trend higher.
The export index hit 54.5 and was the brightest aspect of the report (remember that very targeted Asian stimulus, led by the Chinese, we’ve been talking about) as the Chinese spending may be starting to show up in this figure.
Corrections:
Beyond referring to all of Thursday’s activity as Friday’s in yesterday’s letter – sorry about that, it’s habit I guess, I also reported the wrong number on the duration of unemployment (in weeks). The numbers I posted were from the previous month when stating: “The mean duration of unemployment (in weeks) made another new high since this series began in 1947, moving up to 22.5 weeks from 21.4.”
The correct number is 24.5 weeks, jumping by the largest amount since the recession began, up from 22.5 weeks in May.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera
After spending nearly the entire session in the red, the broad market (as measured by the S&P 500) rallied in the final minutes of trading to close above the day’s opening price. Market weakness just prior to the release of the day’s sole economic reading suggested things were going to get ugly if that number was to miss the expectation; when it beat, most stock prices began to slowly improve and picked up steam in the final half hour.
The traditional areas of safety, consumer staples, utilities and health-care shares were among yesterday’s top performers. Energy, basic materials and tech were the biggest losers. We talked about the likelihood of sector rotation taking place a couple of weeks back, out of the reflation trade of oil and basic material shares and into consumer staples, health-care and utilities. We’ll see if this move has some legs this time.
Volume remained weak on Monday as just 1.1 billion shares traded on the NYSE Composite, 21% below the three-month average. Ten shares fell for every seven that rose on the Big Board.
Market Activity for July 6, 2009
Crude-OilCrude for August delivery continues to pull back after its steep 70% run up from $34 to $73 that occurred in just four months. Oil continues to trade on prospects for GDP, and with concerns that the economic rebound may be delayed (at least in terms of the recent consensus estimate) its moving lower again, down 4% on Monday to $64 per barrel. Of course, some of this is just natural profit taking after such a powerful move higher.
I’m not even going to try to guess where crude goes from here. Supply/demand fundamentals probably don’t justify a price higher than $50-55 per barrel, but we’ve got massive deficits and very easy monetary policy to think about. These policies should affect the dollar’s value over time, pushing it lower, and this will have the opposite result on commodity prices. If the dollar does trend lower over the next couple of years, one wonders if what has become the anti-dollar trade (the euro) will continue as the Eurozone is going be burdened with lackluster growth prospects for some time. This means the commodity play may work as the anti-dollar trade for the next 18-24 months and that means higher oil prices, but probably not before an additional pullback as is typically the case after surges, such as the one we’ve seen over the past three months.
ISM Service Sector
The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) service-sector gauge continued to show improvement as the reading for June came in at a better-than-expected 47.0 – three percentage points higher than the May reading of 44.0 and a pretty darned good number considering the state of things.
While a reading below 50 suggests the service sector remains in contraction mode (for the ninth-straight month now), continued improvement is obviously a good sign but like so many data releases these days there’s always something that diminishes an attempt at relative optimism. Six of the 18 industries the index covers reported business grew in June, which is unchanged from May and down from seven in April. One would certainly want to see a steady trend of improvement here.
This headline reading of 47.0 is a composite of several sub indices: business activity, new orders, prices and employment. These individual indices are important to also view separately as a gauge of where things are going from here.The business activity reading came closer to hitting 50 than anytime since the economic world changed in September, posting a reading of 49.8 after the 42.4 in May.
New orders, one of the best indicators of future activity, hit 48.6 after posting 44.4 (and a drop from the April reading) in May.
The employment index rose to 43.4 in June from 39.0 in May. Five industries reported an increase in employment (Real Estate, Rental & Leasing, Entertainment & Leisure, Agriculture and Forestry), eight reported a decrease and four reported no change.
The prices paid index moved above 50 for the first time since October, hitting 53.7 – this may be something to watch. We’re far from the level of 80 hit when last summer’s commodity spike pushed the CPI to 5.6% on a year-over-year basis, but I don’t think it will take much to juice prices again, and the ISM prices paid figures will be a key number to watch.
The inventory sentiment reading jumped to 67.0 from 62.5, which means more industries view their level of stockpiles are too high at this time – this reading likely completely offsets the improved reading in the new orders index; with respect to the outlook for the next couple of headline ISM readings. If firms continue to believe inventories are too high, it’s tough to make the argument that new orders will trend higher.
The export index hit 54.5 and was the brightest aspect of the report (remember that very targeted Asian stimulus, led by the Chinese, we’ve been talking about) as the Chinese spending may be starting to show up in this figure.
Corrections:
Beyond referring to all of Thursday’s activity as Friday’s in yesterday’s letter – sorry about that, it’s habit I guess, I also reported the wrong number on the duration of unemployment (in weeks). The numbers I posted were from the previous month when stating: “The mean duration of unemployment (in weeks) made another new high since this series began in 1947, moving up to 22.5 weeks from 21.4.”
The correct number is 24.5 weeks, jumping by the largest amount since the recession began, up from 22.5 weeks in May.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera
Monday, July 6, 2009
Daily Insight
U.S. stocks slid on Friday after the two main jobs reports showed the labor market remains very fragile and in fact still in a weaker state than is the case during the typical recession.
There had been this thought, particularly after the better-than-expected May employment report, that labor conditions had improved to the peak levels of monthly job losses seen during the normal recession – a level around 300K-350K in jobs losses per month. That thought was crushed on Friday as 467,000 payroll positions were lost and the duration figures (the data that shows the percentage of unemployed persons who go at least 27 weeks before finding a jobs and the overall average duration of unemployment) continue to move higher.
These results increase doubts that consumer activity will be able to muster a sustained rebound in the near future, and thus this extends the concern that the economic rebound will be delayed. One thing is pretty sure. Whether it’s the private-sector income data, jobless claims, or the monthly payroll data, a sustainable consumer rebound is a ways off, certainly more than a year out. If it took this latest employment data to make people realize that, then it’s all for the better. We don’t need the equity market getting out of hand and then selling off in a major way simply because wishful thinking allowed stock values to get ahead of economic improvement.
Friday’s decline capped the worst weekly performance in seven weeks and the first three-consecutive weeks of decline since hitting the 12 ½ year low on March 9. Volume was very weak again on Friday as just 704 million shares traded on the Big Board. This is pretty normal for the session just ahead of the July 4 holiday, but with the combination of jobless claims and the monthly payroll data out on the same day (a very unusual event) I would have thought more people to be around. The NYSE also endured another technical glitch, we had one of these a few sessions back, as they move to a new system, so that likely had an effect on trading volume as well. Still, volume has been lackluster for about a month now, evidence that there isn’t much conviction at these levels. For perspective, Friday’s volume was little more than half the three-month average.
Market Activity for July 2, 2009
Jobless Claims
The Labor Department reported initial jobless claims fell 16,000 to 614,000 in the week ended June 27. The four-week average fell 2,750 to 615,250.
Continuing claims fell 53,000 to 6.702 million. So, it appears we’ve seen the peak, but the decline in continuing claims is a function of benefits expiring rather than from an increase in job opportunities. It will be interesting to watch how this figure reacts over the next couple of months. The fiscal stimulus package funds $7 billion to states so that they can increase the duration of unemployment benefits, increasing it to 59 weeks from the current 26. I’m not completely sure if this extended time period has already been put in place within a number of states or not, but I am sure that this extension will make interpreting the data that much more difficult.
Bottom line is that jobless claims remain stubbornly high, not able to move below the very elevated 600K mark. Until we begin to see this figure move back to the 550K range (still a very elevated level but meaningful improvement from here) one cannot expect much good news from the overall employment situation. And speaking of which…
June Jobs Report
The Labor Department also reported that payrolls declined 467,000 in June, much worse than the expected decline of 365,000 – it appears that ADP figure was right on the mark, as it had the decline at 473,000.
The prior month’s reading was actually revised to show better-than-initially recorded improvement as just 322,000 positions were lost, down from the 345,000 initially estimated.
That initial 345,000 figure had many hoping the monthly job losses were set to trend to a level that more closely corresponds to the peaks of monthly job losses for the past three recessions (which is why I labeled them on the chart above). Those hopes were dashed with Friday’s release as we’ve moved back to the 1980 peak (lower horizontal line on the chart above). Problem is, this amount of monthly jobs losses was the peak hit in the 1980 recession; this time this level is actually an improvement from recent peaks we’ve seen this go around. It’s going to be a couple of months still before we move back to calmer monthly declines.
In terms of specific, the goods-producing sectors shed 223,000 positions last month, down from the 215,000 loss in May – still a bit better than the three-month average of -235K though. The manufacturing sector led this component lower, cutting 136,000 jobs – a bit better than the three-month average of -147K; the construction sector reduced payrolls by 79,000 – right in line with the three-month average.
Service-producing industries led the declines, slashing 244,000 positions. Business services cut 118,000 jobs, worse than the three-month average of -98K. Trade and transportation shed 51,000, a nice improvement however from the three-month average of -72K.
Yet again, the only component of the data that showed job creation was education and health services as education added 15K and health-care services added 19K.
The unemployment rate rose to 9.5% (highest level since August 1983) from 9.4% in May – this was a bit better than the 9.6% expected, but it’s only because workers removed themselves from the official jobless rate by not looking for work in the four weeks that encompassed this survey period, the “discouraged worker.”
The U4 unemployment rate jumped again (this reading adds in those discouraged workers – again, these are people who have looked for work sometime over the past 12 months but not in the four weeks covered by this report) to 10.0% from 9.8% in May.
The U6 unemployment rate (this is U4 and adds those working part-time for economic reasons – could not find full-time work so settled for part-time) ticked up to 16.5% from 16.4%.
The mean duration of unemployment (in weeks) made another new high since this series began in 1947, moving up to 22.5 weeks from 21.4.
The percentage of those out of work for at least 27 weeks (the longest duration measured by the BLS) jumped to 29% of those unemployed from 27% in May.
Hourly earnings came in flat ($18.53 per hour) and hours worked fell again (down to 33.0 avg. hours per week, which is a record low since the series began in 1964). These figures, needless to say, do not bode well for the monthly income data over the next few months. Recall, 97% of the increase in personal income for May was due to government transfer payments, all private-sector components (save rental income, which makes up only 5% of the total) have been in decline for months now, and it won’t be long before this Western European-style income boost runs its course. Those clinging to the belief that consumer activity will make a sustained rebound anytime soon are kidding themselves.
This morning we get the ISM service –sector reading fro June, and a number above 45 is going to be needed to calm concerns. While this level would still suggest the service economy is in contraction mode, we need to see additional improvement – the reading came in at 44.0 for May. Outside of this figure, we don’t have a heck of a lot of data out this week – the only other big release is initial jobless claims 0n Thursday. We’ll get into second-quarter earnings season next week and the trading may just be especially lackluster until those results begin to come in.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera
There had been this thought, particularly after the better-than-expected May employment report, that labor conditions had improved to the peak levels of monthly job losses seen during the normal recession – a level around 300K-350K in jobs losses per month. That thought was crushed on Friday as 467,000 payroll positions were lost and the duration figures (the data that shows the percentage of unemployed persons who go at least 27 weeks before finding a jobs and the overall average duration of unemployment) continue to move higher.
These results increase doubts that consumer activity will be able to muster a sustained rebound in the near future, and thus this extends the concern that the economic rebound will be delayed. One thing is pretty sure. Whether it’s the private-sector income data, jobless claims, or the monthly payroll data, a sustainable consumer rebound is a ways off, certainly more than a year out. If it took this latest employment data to make people realize that, then it’s all for the better. We don’t need the equity market getting out of hand and then selling off in a major way simply because wishful thinking allowed stock values to get ahead of economic improvement.
Friday’s decline capped the worst weekly performance in seven weeks and the first three-consecutive weeks of decline since hitting the 12 ½ year low on March 9. Volume was very weak again on Friday as just 704 million shares traded on the Big Board. This is pretty normal for the session just ahead of the July 4 holiday, but with the combination of jobless claims and the monthly payroll data out on the same day (a very unusual event) I would have thought more people to be around. The NYSE also endured another technical glitch, we had one of these a few sessions back, as they move to a new system, so that likely had an effect on trading volume as well. Still, volume has been lackluster for about a month now, evidence that there isn’t much conviction at these levels. For perspective, Friday’s volume was little more than half the three-month average.
Market Activity for July 2, 2009
Jobless ClaimsThe Labor Department reported initial jobless claims fell 16,000 to 614,000 in the week ended June 27. The four-week average fell 2,750 to 615,250.
Continuing claims fell 53,000 to 6.702 million. So, it appears we’ve seen the peak, but the decline in continuing claims is a function of benefits expiring rather than from an increase in job opportunities. It will be interesting to watch how this figure reacts over the next couple of months. The fiscal stimulus package funds $7 billion to states so that they can increase the duration of unemployment benefits, increasing it to 59 weeks from the current 26. I’m not completely sure if this extended time period has already been put in place within a number of states or not, but I am sure that this extension will make interpreting the data that much more difficult.Bottom line is that jobless claims remain stubbornly high, not able to move below the very elevated 600K mark. Until we begin to see this figure move back to the 550K range (still a very elevated level but meaningful improvement from here) one cannot expect much good news from the overall employment situation. And speaking of which…June Jobs Report
The Labor Department also reported that payrolls declined 467,000 in June, much worse than the expected decline of 365,000 – it appears that ADP figure was right on the mark, as it had the decline at 473,000.
The prior month’s reading was actually revised to show better-than-initially recorded improvement as just 322,000 positions were lost, down from the 345,000 initially estimated.That initial 345,000 figure had many hoping the monthly job losses were set to trend to a level that more closely corresponds to the peaks of monthly job losses for the past three recessions (which is why I labeled them on the chart above). Those hopes were dashed with Friday’s release as we’ve moved back to the 1980 peak (lower horizontal line on the chart above). Problem is, this amount of monthly jobs losses was the peak hit in the 1980 recession; this time this level is actually an improvement from recent peaks we’ve seen this go around. It’s going to be a couple of months still before we move back to calmer monthly declines.
In terms of specific, the goods-producing sectors shed 223,000 positions last month, down from the 215,000 loss in May – still a bit better than the three-month average of -235K though. The manufacturing sector led this component lower, cutting 136,000 jobs – a bit better than the three-month average of -147K; the construction sector reduced payrolls by 79,000 – right in line with the three-month average.
Service-producing industries led the declines, slashing 244,000 positions. Business services cut 118,000 jobs, worse than the three-month average of -98K. Trade and transportation shed 51,000, a nice improvement however from the three-month average of -72K.
Yet again, the only component of the data that showed job creation was education and health services as education added 15K and health-care services added 19K.
The unemployment rate rose to 9.5% (highest level since August 1983) from 9.4% in May – this was a bit better than the 9.6% expected, but it’s only because workers removed themselves from the official jobless rate by not looking for work in the four weeks that encompassed this survey period, the “discouraged worker.”
The U4 unemployment rate jumped again (this reading adds in those discouraged workers – again, these are people who have looked for work sometime over the past 12 months but not in the four weeks covered by this report) to 10.0% from 9.8% in May.The U6 unemployment rate (this is U4 and adds those working part-time for economic reasons – could not find full-time work so settled for part-time) ticked up to 16.5% from 16.4%.
The mean duration of unemployment (in weeks) made another new high since this series began in 1947, moving up to 22.5 weeks from 21.4.
The percentage of those out of work for at least 27 weeks (the longest duration measured by the BLS) jumped to 29% of those unemployed from 27% in May.
Hourly earnings came in flat ($18.53 per hour) and hours worked fell again (down to 33.0 avg. hours per week, which is a record low since the series began in 1964). These figures, needless to say, do not bode well for the monthly income data over the next few months. Recall, 97% of the increase in personal income for May was due to government transfer payments, all private-sector components (save rental income, which makes up only 5% of the total) have been in decline for months now, and it won’t be long before this Western European-style income boost runs its course. Those clinging to the belief that consumer activity will make a sustained rebound anytime soon are kidding themselves.This morning we get the ISM service –sector reading fro June, and a number above 45 is going to be needed to calm concerns. While this level would still suggest the service economy is in contraction mode, we need to see additional improvement – the reading came in at 44.0 for May. Outside of this figure, we don’t have a heck of a lot of data out this week – the only other big release is initial jobless claims 0n Thursday. We’ll get into second-quarter earnings season next week and the trading may just be especially lackluster until those results begin to come in.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera
Bond Recap
A disappointing Nonfarm Payrolls number forced short-term yields lower on Friday as the two-year finished below 1% for the first time since 6/4. Unlike long term interest rates, which are primarily influenced by inflation, short term rates move more with expectations of Fed policy, namely the Fed’s manipulation on the Fed Funds Target Rate. As expectations grow for an improving labor market, so will expectations for a turnaround in Fed policy. The two year sold off throughout June as some in the market believed the Fed was moving closer to raising Fed Funds from their current target of 0-.25%, but the optimism proved to be too much too fast as we have moved back to where we began the month. The graph below recaps the last 60 days on the 2-year.
Supply yet again comes to the forefront this week with $73 billion being auctioned, including $8 billion in ten-year TIPS. Although the dollar amount is far from the $100+ billion weeks we have seen so far this year, the market will have to deal with 4 days of auctions in one week for the first time.
Cliff Reynolds
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)