- Getting It Right Twice
- Does It Pay to Diversify?
- New at Acropolis
- Inside the Economy
- Bailout Scorecard
- Equity Markets Activity
- Fixed Income Strategy
- Ask Acropolis
- Big Picture
Click here or on the cartoon to access the issue.
Click here or on the cartoon to access the issue.
S&P 500: +31.40 (+3.81%)
The biggest news story of the day was Wells Fargo reporting a first-quarter profit that beat even the most optimistic estimates, sparking a rally in financial shares. Adding to the positive sentiment were reports that banks are holding up in the government's stress tests, but some still may need aid.
Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) -3.71%
Wal-Mart again posted revenue gains in the month of March, but they fell short of lofty expectations. Same-store sales (stores open at least 12 months) rose 1.4 percent, again driven by the health and wellness, and home and grocery segments. The world’s largest retailer projects its sales growth will be at the high end of its 1 to 3 percent guidance for the quarter ending May 1.
Wal-Mart continues to focus advertising on dinnerware and drapes while slashing prices on staple food items to appeal to consumers entertaining more at home. The company expects Easter to drive April sales performance.
Other retailers reported mixed results as many are still struggling with waning consumer confidence. While some retailers cited the shift in Easter this year out of March and into the April reporting period as a reason for weakness, others noted a gain from having an extra day in the reporting period, since stores didn’t have to close for Easter Sunday in March.
Quick Hits
Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst
Principal Financial Group (PFG) +21.28%
The Wall Street Journal reports that the Treasury Department has decided to grant TARP funding to life insurers. No details have been released regarding which companies will receive aid. Life insurers argue that federal capital injections would allow them to buy more bank bonds and stimulate lending – the industry owns about $1 trillion in corporate debt.
AIG’s expanded and drawn-out rescue has played a big role in the delay of a decision on the insurance industry’s requests for aid. Principal Financial Group filed their TARP application back in November 2008. The insurance industry shouldn’t have been as aggressive – hindsight is 20/20 – but that won’t be a problem once the government gets involved and insurance profits are tamed for a long time.
In Principal’s case, the Life and Health insurance segment accounted for 45 percent of operating revenue in 2008. Like their peers, Principal has sizeable losses in its investment portfolio that back their policies. Principal, however, avoided guaranteeing minimum returns in their variable annuity business, which is a practice that has exacerbated problems for their peers.
Still, the bigger reason we continue to hold Principal (aside from the tremendous upside) is their Asset Management segment, which accounts for well over 50 percent of operating revenue. The bread and butter of this segment is Principal’s 401(k) business, which is a dominating player in the small to medium-size business market.
Because less than 20 percent of companies with fewer than 100 employees have 401(k) plans, Principal has plenty of opportunity to grow through this underpenetrated market. What may prove to be more important to Principal’s growth is their growing presence in several emerging markets such as Chile, Mexico, Hong Kong, Brazil, India, China and Malaysia.
Quick Hits
Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst
U.S. stocks declined yesterday as a pull-back was bound to occur after another strong rally last week, which marked the fourth weekly gain.
As mentioned yesterday, stocks may have a rough patch to get through as we’re heading into what will be the worst ex-financial earnings season we’ve seen during this contraction. Bank profits should help overall S&P 500 earnings as interest spreads (borrow near zero and lend at 5-6%) could help this segment post an actual profit increase, which would be the first since Q3 2007 for the group.
But ex-financial S&P 500 profits, which posted their first quarterly decline (since this mess began in September) during Q4 earnings season, will likely fall 30%. This will be difficult for the market to deal with following the strong upswing that took place off of the wicked 666 low of March 9 – up 25% prior to the past two sessions. Since we’re range bound, it will be important to make the necessary pull back short and sweet. If we keep it to a 10-12% decline, our guess is we’ll re-rally in quick order. (This view is somewhat supported by activity during the equally nasty bear market of 1974.) If it’s more than that, it may invoke enough fear to make a quick resurgence difficult.
In terms of economic data, the market will be focused on Thursday’s jobless claims figure and next week’s retail sales number for March. We’ll probably need to see some improvement in jobless claims – at least some sign we’ll trend back to the 500K handle – and it will be imperative for March retail sales to post a gain – too many people are riding on the assumption that consumer activity can rebound in a sustained way so if this number disappoints it may be a rather tough blow for market psychology to absorb.
In terms of the sector trade, the cyclicals took the beating yesterday– industrials, telecom, basic materials, consumer discretionary. The relative winners were the typical safe-havens – utilities, health-care and to a lesser degree, staples.
Financials held up relatively well for the vast majority of the session, but plunged 2% in the final 20 minutes of trading – possibly on news that the Manhattan DA uncovered an Iranian/Chinese money laundering scheme in which they used fake companies to facilitate the purchase of banned materials to make missile systems and nuclear weapons.
Market Activity for April 7, 2009
Crude
Crude oil moved below $50 per barrel yesterday, falling 3.2%, (and off by 10% over the past four sessions) as traders anticipate this morning’s Energy Department report will show stockpiles remain at a 15-year high, or 13% above the five-year average – this is something that has occurred very quickly as stockpiles were in line with the five-year average just three weeks back. Daily fuel demand appeared to be on the rise as the prior four-weeks showed demand increased 1.2% from the year-ago period. However, last week’s report showed demand fell a pretty substantial 4.4% for the latest four week based on year-ago levels.
.
Until global demand picks up oil will continue to trade on the dollar and stocks (that is when doubt begins to rise regarding a global economic rebound, the dollar – the crisis/safe-haven currency – value rises and stocks sell off, in which case oil comes under some pressure, and vice versa).
Some traders hopped onto the oil train as a way to hedge against the inflationary event that is likely to come as the Fed and Treasury (along with other governments) are pumping trillions into the system. This is what made it look like we were headed for $60. However, between pessimism over earnings season and recent predictions that the rally won’t last, that hedge has come off a bit. (Last night’s earnings results out of Alcoa won’t help the commodity trade over the short term either.)
The Old Washington 180
In a dramatic, but typical, political reversal (“Who me, I never advocated that?”) House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank has proposed legislation prohibiting lenders from extending mortgage loans to those who can’t afford them – one assumes Mr. Frank determines the parameters, which is scary enough. What’s amazing about this is that Mr. Frank was one of the most vocal members of Congress over the past decade demanding that banks offer credit to low-income households – some of you may recall he is also the person quoted as saying, “I want to roll the dice” with Fannie and Freddie. What we’re going through today is yet another serious consequence of government’s social engineering plans –specifically the 1995 modification of the Community Reinvestment Act. (And we shouldn’t let the Fed off the hook by blaming only the members of Congress, for it is their massive monetary policy mistakes that made the whole leverage issue and housing bubble possible.)
As is typical, Congress is behind the curve as the market is already well into this process --- those with low credit scores have largely been shut out of the credit markets for the past six months. The shift in credit standards (and the lack of private sector financing as a result of default rates) has been so dramatic in fact that the Fed has rolled out a series of facilities to address this issue.
Second Thoughts?
In other news involving the government and their attempts to ameliorate credit conditions, Treasury Secretary Geithner seems to be running into some difficulty finding participation in the Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP). The fact that Geithner hasn’t been able to officially announce the participants (which was only five based on the restrictions they place on participation) spells trouble. Now they have come out and extended the time with which to apply, stating the reason for the extension is to allow smaller and minority-led firms into the PPIP.
Call me skeptical, but this looks like a way to disguise a lack of alacrity to participate – gee, the populist wave Congress is fomenting can’t be a cause of this possible hesitation could it? On the current political trajectory, firms can’t be sure they’ll be able to keep the potential profits – especially when the press starts reporting on the degree of profits made and the very attractive terms with which the government extended them loans.
Same is true for the Federal Reserve’s TALF program (a program that is largely focused at reducing consumer-lending costs). The goal of TALF is $1 trillion in activity, yet in its first week investors applied for only $4 billion in loans and the Fed received applications for just $1.4 billion in last week’s round – at this rate the $1 trillion goal will be reached by the year 2200. It’s not difficult to understand why investors have become wary of dealing with the government.
Consumer Credit
The Federal Reserve reported that consumer credit fell $7.4 billion in February, or 3.5% at a seasonally-adjusted annual rate, to $2.56 trillion. The decline marks the fourth decline of the past five months. The January reading was revised higher to show a $8.14 billion increase.
This report on consumer credit involves both revolving (such as credit cards) and non-revolving (fixed payment loans such as auto and student loans) – mortgage loans are not included in this data. Revolving credit continues to retrench (down 9.7% at an annual rate), while non-revolving credit was virtually unchanged.
The plunge in the stock market, the continued decline in home prices (for most regions) and rising unemployment have sent a clear signal to consumers to reduce credit card balances, or at least reduce transactions. This is an event that simply needs to run its course. Over the next several months, it means a sustained rebound in consumer spending is unlikely.
Have a great day!
Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst
There seems to be a bit of profit taking ahead of profit season. Corporate earnings are the big X-factor in determining the sustainability of the most recent rally. The first quarter was likely a huge stinker and earnings will likely carry less weight in the market than the outlooks companies are giving. Are things the same, getting worse or getting better? What are companies saying about jobs? Are there any real surprises? While there are some big names releasing earnings this week, next week is when things really start getting interesting.
Emerson Electric (EMR) unch
Emerson cut its profit forecast for the year, citing falling demand and inventory reductions by customers. The company now expects earnings between $2.40 and $2.60 per share, down from $2.70 to $2.95 per share.
The company said the weak economy has taken a toll on Emerson’s residential, nonresidential and capital businesses.
WellPoint (WLP) +2.27% UnitedHealth Group (UNH) +6.93%
Insurers with U.S. Medicare-backed health plans for the elderly and disabled advanced after Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced a rate increase of 0.8 percent in 2010, higher than originally proposed.
Quick Hits
Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst