Visit us at our new home!

For new daily content, visit us at our new blog: http://www.acrinv.com/blog/

Friday, November 28, 2008

Afternoon Review

Jacobs Engineering Group (JEC) +5.81%
JEC, the second-largest publicly traded U.S. engineering company, has surged 71.23 percent in the last five trading sessions on optimism that a government stimulus package will boost highway and energy projects.

President-elect Barack Obama plans to propose a stimulus package of as much as $600 billion for infrastructure such as roads and energy after taking office in January to help pull the U.S. out of recession. JEC said that billable hours have reached a record pace and results in October and November are running ahead of expectations.

Other companies that have benefited from news of infrastructure stimulus packages across the globe include: HSC, GE, CAT, IR, MTW.


Bank of America (BAC) +5.31%
The Federal Reserve’s approval of BAC’s Merrill Lynch acquisition this week, gives BAC control over roughly 11.9 percent of the nation’s deposits. Banks are not usually allowed to control more than 10 percent of the nation’s insured deposits after an acquisition, but there is an exception in some circumstances. BAC likely wasn’t blocked because the insured deposits held by Merrill Lynch were in an industrial bank and a federal thrift.

The Fed decided that the acquisition is “not likely to have a significantly adverse effect on competition in any relevant banking market or in any relevant market. The Fed didn’t require BAC to divest of any deposits following the deal, but did say BAC “has committed that it will conform, terminate, or divest, within two years of the acquisition of Merrill, all the activities and investments of Merrill that are not permissible for a bank holding company” under federal law.

In other BAC news...CEO Ken Lewis expressed that the money the federal government injected into BAC was money that the bank “did not need and did not seek…We accepted the funds from the government as part of a broad plan to stabilize the financial markets generally, and will pay interest to the government on the funds until the investment is paid back.” Lewis went on to say that BAC was “one of the strongest and most stable banks in the world.”


General Electric (GE) +6.05%
Ending months of speculation, Korea-based LG Electronics said it will not acquire the home appliance unit of GE. In May, GE indicated it was planning to sell its appliance business, which at the time was expected to fetch between $5 billion and $8 billion.


Holiday Shopping
This is an interesting article from Seeking Alpha, which takes a look at holiday shopping trends.

However, there is really no reason for this type of madness as this weekend’s holiday shopping takes place. Chances are that these “one-weekend” prices will be the same in two weeks, and maybe even lower.


Quick Hits

--

Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst

Fixed Income Recap

Fed Announces MBS Buying Spree
The Fed beefed up its efforts to support the suffering credit market today by announcing a plan to begin buying $100 billion of Fannie and Freddie debt starting next week and $500 billion of GSE guaranteed MBS starting next month.

Fannie and Freddie participate in open market operations regularly. They buy and sell securities to maintain a desired level of liquidity in the market. They were taken into conservatorship in part because the Treasury wanted to make sure they would be able to continue such operations. The Fed program announced today, coupled with the acceleration of MBS buying by the GSEs to support the mortgage market while in conservatorship, leads many to believe that full nationalization of Fannie and Freddie is a likely to come after the dust settles.

Fannie, Freddie and Ginnie own or guarantee about $4.5 trillion of MBS combined, putting the announced Fed buying program at over 10% of the market. In an environment when agency MBS have been struggling to find buyers, a purchasing program like this is very significant.

The market liked the news initially as 30 year MBS outperformed Treasuries in early trading, but interest tapered off as the day went on. The long term effect of the program will likely be positive for MBS, as some of the supply is absorbed by the Treasury, but they will continue to be volatile.

FDIC Corporate Bond Guarantee
The 3 year $5 billion Goldman Sachs issue mentioned yesterday was priced today at 200 basis points over Treasuries, about a 3.6% yield. The issue was well received by investors as the yield tightened about 15 basis points to Treasuries in today’s trading.

This FDIC insured corporate bond market is new, and many remain skeptical. The credit is being viewed as similar to FDIC insured bank deposits, without the $250k cap, but with $5 billion in this issue alone, liquidity stands to be better than CDs. We would expect investors to remain unsure of the true value of bonds such as these until more institutions issue debt under FDIC’s program.


Cliff J. Reynolds Jr.
Junior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks shook off several inauspicious economic reports (to put it mildly), extending the rally to four sessions – a jump that has sent the broad market higher by 18%. A rally in oil prices may have helped sentiment on Wednesday as crude and stocks have been moving in the same direction more than ever – not every session, but many. Why? Because lower prices remind everyone of the depressed nature of demand, so when oil jumps, it helps to ease this concern – it’s a psychological thing.

President-elect Obama also held another press conference, this time explaining that former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker will be running an economic advisory team for the next president. Lawrence Summers will be the ultimate decision maker with regard to Obama’s economic policy and everyone knows it, but Volcker has a lot of credibility so just having him next to the President-elect probably helped the market as well.

We’ll see how she reacts next week after coordinated terrorist events in India have returned that risk to the fore. If we can keep the momentum moving through this event we may be able to extend a surge through year-end.

Today is Black Friday (traditionally the day retailers begin to turn a profit for the year) and a very cautious consumer will likely add another unfavorable event that the market will have to deal with. On this point, while it is very likely this year’s holiday-shopping season will be the weakest in a long while the 60% decline in gasoline prices may provide a boost. We’ll soon find out whether the extra money left in pockets will be saved or spent.

Many analysts and economists continue to look to today’s activity in order to assess the shopping season, but this day doesn’t apply as it has in the past. Consumers become incrementally smarter each year, knowing if Black Friday shapes up badly, desperate discounting from retail chains will ensue. Point is won’t know how things will turn out for a couple of weeks still.

Market Activity for November 26, 2008

The Economy

We had a lot of data released on Wednesday, so I’ve condensed the comments to get it all in.

First, the Labor Department reported initial jobless claims fell 14,000 to 529,000 in the week ended November 22. While it’s nice to see claims fall we remain at elevated levels and this will remain the case for a few months now. Since we have entered very weak labor-market territory (the labor market held up well for the first eight months of the year, but much damage was done by the credit freeze-up), we’ll remain above the 500k mark for some time.

The unemployment rate peaks roughly a year after a recession has ended, as job creation has a large lag to it, but jobless claims are more of a leading indicator. Still, it will be a few months at least before the gauge begins to ease – and there is really no visibility right now, we’ll need a couple of months worth of data in order to get a decent estimate as to when layoffs will begin to wane.

The four-week moving average of claims increased 11,000 to 518,000 – the highest reading since December 1982. (We’ll note though that when we adjust for the increase in the work-force, claims are much lower than that former period. We’d need to get to 700,000 on an adjusted basis – which shows just how bad that 1981-1982 job market was. Back in 1982 the U.S. work force stood at 112 million, today it is 155 million; jobless claims of 500,000 was obviously much worse back then.)


Continuing claims remain high, but fell nicely – down 54,000 for the week ended November 15 (there’s a week’s lag between this reading and continuing claims if you’re wondering) but again it will take a couple weeks of improvement to get excited about the decline.


Second, the Commerce Department stated durable goods orders went kerplunk in October. No real surprise here as we know October was a terrible month – but the degree of decline was startling, falling 6.2%. The ex-transportation reading was very bad as well, falling 4.4% after a meaningful 2.3% decline in September.

Literally every segment of the report was down big, which is what it takes to get declines of this magnitude. The segment we focus on is the non-defense capital goods ex-aircraft figure (the proxy for business spending), and that number plunged 4.0%. The credit event that began in September caused businesses to pull-back on spending plans in a swift manner.

Machinery, electrical equipment, and primary metals all dropped big time – which also shows the lack of global spending. I’d expect some kind of rebound by December as the heightened level of caution wanes. U.S. firms – in the aggregate – have the resources to increase business spending and even as demand has weakened substantially, we should see a bounce a month out.

The inventory-to-sales ratio within the durables report is rising amid this weakness, but we’re coming from such a historically low level that the figure is not alarming.


Third, Commerce also reported personal incomes rose 0.3% for October, which brings the year-over-year increase to 3.3% - up from 3.2% in September but this rate of climb has slowed from 4.5% on average for the first-half of the year. All things considered, income growth is holding up decently, but the October reading was largely boosted by government transfer payments. Without these payments, along with jobless benefits, the reading would have been unchanged to 0.1% for October.

The good news is that real disposable income (after-tax income adjusted for inflation) jumped 0.9% last month and is now positive over the past 12 months. This figure had been negative for a couple of months due to erstwhile energy prices. Now that energy, along with other commodity prices and overall inflation, has come down, real incomes have benefited.


Within the same report Commerce also stated personal spending fell a large 1.0% in October (down 0.5% adjusting for inflation), marking the fourth-straight month of decline. But spending will not decline forever and the just discussed bounce in real incomes should help.

Gasoline prices alone are down 60% from the peak hit in July-August and this is keeping roughly $300 per month in consumers’ pockets. As consumers hold back on activity, this boost to the pocketbook will build and may help spending pop in December. It is pretty likely, however, that we’ll have to wait six months, maybe more, before consumer activity begins to rise in a sustained way again – it’s impossible to offer a meaningful guess at this point, but there is a lot consumers are facing right now. Uncertainty over how many jobs will be shed over the next 12 months is causing prudent caution at this time.

The savings rate has risen to 2.4% from 1.2% in September and 0.6% in August – households will continue to raise savings so long as asset prices continue to decline, specifically stock prices. (Although the huge jump in home prices 2002-2005 also affected this reading; now that the opposite has occurred more is being placed in savings accounts)

We’ve talked at length over the past few years how those worried about the savings rate are missing the picture. The way the savings rate is calculate assumes the vehicles for savings have not changed in 30 years. Over the past 20 years for sure, most household savings have moved to the stock market, and stock-price appreciation escapes the savings rate calculations. However, with stocks down heavily over the past couple of months in particular, traditional savings (adding money to savings accounts and CDs) has re-emerged. This figure will fall again when stock prices begin to rise in a sustained manner.

Fourth, the Chicago Purchasing Manager’s report stated activity in the country’s largest manufacturing region declinedl further after falling off the proverbial cliff in October (that October reading fell hard to 37.8 from a pretty robust level of 56.7 in September – just another indication things really changed in the late-September/October period).

For November, the Chicago-area manufacturing survey fell to 33.8, which is the lowest level since 1982. We’re seeing a lot of that lately -- comparisons to the 1981-1982 recession.


We may not see much improvement when the December figure is released as both new orders and order backlog fell to very low levels.



Finally, the Commerce Department – they were busy over there -- reported new homes sales fell 5.3% in October to an annual rate of 433,000 units, hitting a 17-year low. The median price of a new home fell to a four-year low of 218,000. This marks a 1.6% decline for the month and 6.9% from the year-ago period. Unfortunately, these declines are a necessary condition to get us through this housing recession.


As you can see via the chart below much improvement has been made on the supply front as new home construction has ramped down big time.


However, relative to the current sales pace, the supply of houses remains at an extreme elevation. But what that houses available for sale figure tells us is once sales rebound, this inventory to sales figure will come down hard. Once it hits 5-6 months’ worth of supply, we’re back in business.


This morning we don’t get much in the way of data as we have a shortened session. Traditionally, most traders are out today (the bond market is closed entirely) so it doesn’t make much sense to release data. We will get manufacturing activity out of the Milwaukee region, but this is not a closely watched gauge. Monday will be another big day of releases as the factory activity for the nation (the ISM reading) and construction spending are due.

Have a great weekend!





Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Afternoon Review

Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) Earnings
HPQ reported results and guidance on Monday that were in-line with last week’s preannouncement. A large portion of the revenue upside came from PCs, where many had expected weakness. Consumer printer hardware sales and commercial systems revenues declined, but supplies revenues grew 9.1 percent. The resulting mix shift towards higher-margin ink and toner supplies produced operating margins of 15.5% versus 15% estimates.

Bailout Scorecard
If you find yourself at Thanksgiving dinner scrambling to address your family’s questions about all of the government bailouts in 2008, here is a good cheatsheet.

Quick Hits

  • Bloomberg posted this interesting article about how stock dividends are disappearing at the fastest rate in 50 years.
  • The S&P 500’s current four-day rally of 18.06%. The last four-day rally was May 27th through May 30th.
  • The central banks, which have poured so many billions into commercial-paper and money-market mutual fund markets that one in every seven dollars, about 15 percent of the $1.6 trillion commercial-paper market, is Fed-supported.
  • Tomorrow, I will give thanks that I am not mentioned on this list.

--

Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks bounced between gain and loss a zillion times Tuesday, big surprise I know, as trading jumped 4% between yesterday’s peak and trough – although that may be considered mild volatility these days. In the end the Dow and S&P 500 moved higher, but the NASDAQ failed to end on the plus side as tech shares were pressured by global growth concerns.

Mid and small capitalization stocks enjoyed strong relative performance, gaining 1.92% and 1.46%, respectively.

Interesting thing occurred about an hour before the market opened. Stock-index futures turned on a dime – after spending most of the pre-market session negative – as Senator Judd Gregg stated the Senate would put pressure on the SEC to end mark-to-market accounting standards (in determining capital adequacy ratios) in an interview on CNBC. Increasingly, more people are beginning to talk about this very big problem as concerns rise over the endless circle such accounting changes have caused. Too bad we didn’t get the outcry sooner, maybe we wouldn’t have needed about 10 new Federal Reserve facilities and the massive level of government spending that has occurred over the past several months. But apparently that would have been too simple.

And speaking of which, the Fed rolled out two more programs yesterday.

One being a $200 billion term lending facility to purchase asset-backed securities backed by car loans, credit card receivables, student loans and small business loans. As the private sector shuns this type of short-term lending, the Fed has stepped in and it should help restart credit channels to consumers and businesses. We’re talking about AAA-rated stuff here, so it’s not quite as risky for the Fed as it sounds, but the Fed does continue to increase the risk level of its balance sheet.

I noticed that these loans will not be subject to mark-to-market requirements. That’s hilarious! It appears the Fed understands how utterly stupid, and harmful, this pro-cyclical form of accounting is. (Exacerbates the froth when asset prices are flying high as firms will need less capital, while it puts an institution – and well as the rest of the economy – in a world of hurt when asset prices are falling as they must raise more capital, which means selling assets at fire-sale prices, which means further write-downs, and thus requires more capital to be raised… anyway, you get the endless circle of death.)

Why we just don’t’ return to the old standard of basing capital adequacy on the original price of an asset is beyond me; one can bet eventually we will.

The second Fed announcement explained they’ll start a program to buy up to $500 billion GSE mortgage-backed securities to support the mortgage-lending market. The announcement has a direct effect on spreads yesterday. This should help to kick-start new home buying. Not sure how it will help re-fi activity as anyone who bought house in the past two years would have to put up additional equity to get back to 80% LTV as the price of the home as declined.

There is a problem when the government rolls out an endless number of programs. This plan to purchase mortgage-backed securities is likely meant to offset the unintended consequence of the FDIC guarantee on bank debt that began a couple of weeks ago. Since the FDIC guarantee means bank debt is backed by full faith and credit of the U.S. government it may have caused investors to move away from mortgage-backed debt in favor of the new safety in bank debt – spreads widened, meaning mortgage rates rose relative to Treasury yields, as a result and this is what the Fed is attempting to reverse.

Market Activity for November 25, 2008
On the economic front, the Commerce Department released its first revision to third-quarter GDP and it was revised down from last month’s initial estimate. The report showed gross domestic product fell 0.5% at a real annual rate during the July-September period, down from the minus 0.3% initially estimated.

The difference was a larger-than-estimated decline in personal consumption, by far the largest component of the report. Personal consumption fell the most since the 1980 recession (this is on a quarter-over-quarter basis at an annual rate) as consumers pulled back in the face of the credit chaos and a stock-market plunge.

While there are some that lack the means to consume more as the jobless rate has increased and many bought houses they could not really afford, the high level of caution that ensued from these events is the largest factor at this time and will keep this component of GDP down big for at least another quarter. The fourth-quarter GDP report will post the worst decline since the 1981-1982 recession, led by another large drop in consumer activity.

We’re coming out of the longest period of uninterrupted personal consumption growth – 66 straight quarters – in the post-WWII period. (The streak would have been interrupted sometime during the 2001-2002 if not for the substantial Fed easing that took place.) The previous record was 38 quarters that ran 1961-1970.



Business fixed investment was also revised down, which had an additional effect on the overall reading. We were on a really nice trajectory with regard to business spending but that all fell apart beginning in August and accelerating into September as businesses became very cautious and put spending plans on hold. This will continue to have a big effect on growth. However, when optimism returns, businesses (in the aggregate) have the resources available for this area to propel us out of these doldrums.

Below is a long-run look at real (inflation-adjusted) GDP. The green line represents our average long-term rate of growth – again, in real terms – of 3.4%. The yellow line represents zero.


In separate reports, we received two additional reports on home prices.

The S&P Case/Shiller Home Price Index showed a decline of 1.85% in September and 17.4% from year-ago levels. Although this was largely driven by areas that witnessed the largest speculative activity, such as San Fran, Phoenix, Las Vegas, Miami and LA. Note that this data is for September.


Based on the existing home price data for October that we received yesterday, this index will show even larger declines next month, especially considering the large decline in the West region.

We also receive the Federal Housing and Finance Agency’s (FHFA) – formerly the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) as longer-term readers may be familiar – gauge of home prices, which showed a decline of 1.3% for September and 7.8% from the year ago period.

All of these home price gauges have their flaws. Case/Shiller is not a broad look, while the FHFA index is broad but misses the upper-end of the market. To get the best look is to average the four main gauges, these two along with the price data from new and existing home sales. This gives you a decline of roughly 10.5% over the past year.

Finally, the Conference Board reported consumer confidence rose from depressed levels, rebounding to 44.9 in November from the lowest reading on record of 38.8 in October. (That October plunge to 38.8 was from the typical recessionary levels of roughly 60. Such a large move illustrates the speed and degree to which the credit event, and more importantly the psychological event the stock-market free-fall, has had on sentiment.

The improvement in the overall index was entirely due to higher expectations as the expectations sub-index rose to 46.7 from 35.7. The present situations index actually fell.

Consumers’ assessment of the labor market remained weak but improved a bit. Those viewing “more jobs” will be available six months out rose slightly to 9.2% from 7.3% in October, while those assuming “less jobs” will be available fell to 33.3% from 41.5% -- thus the net “more jobs” minus “less jobs” index improved to -24.1% from -34.2% in October. Those expecting things to remain the same rose to 57.5% from 51.2%.

We generally do not spend time on these confidence surveys, but have over the past couple of months because consumer expectations and confidence are vitally important right now – same is true for business sentiment. This is why we’ve harped on a tax-rate response to the current situation, particularly on capital. Just as the headlong 45% decline in stocks from the peak (and specifically the 35% slide since September) has crushed confidence, a sustained stock-market rally can bring it right back -- and nothing can spark a swift upswing in stock prices like lower tax rates on capital.

Further, if consumers have low expectations of future disposable (after-tax) income, then raise those expectations – the Obama camp (as they hold another press conference today) can do this now by explicitly stating current tax rates will be made permanent. I know, I’m fantasizing here.

However, if we cannot lower all tax rates on income, then let’s at least collapse the 25% tax bracket into the 15% bracket – the Peter Ferrara plan. This would slash marginal tax rates by 40% for the vast majority of workers – singles making $32,500-$78,850 and married coupled earning $65,101-$131,450. This group is the middle class and such a move would be much more powerful than the feckless exercise of handing out $500-$1,000 checks, or spending $500 billion on Lord knows what.

Have a great day and a great Thanksgiving!





Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Fixed Income Recap

Treasuries
Treasuries sold off today, not quite reversing the huge rally from last week. The 2 and 10 year treasuries closed the day yielding about 1.2% and 3.32% respectively.

MBS
Freddie Mac surprised most of the market when it reported a $26.7 billion increase in their retained portfolio for October. This was the second biggest one month increase year to date and the biggest since May. I expect Fannie to report a similar number later this week.

MBS spreads over Treasuries widened throughout October despite the heavy buying by the agencies. This is further evidence that demand for even agency MBS continues to suffer.

The concerns about MBS are more than the lingering credit concerns surrounding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but a general desire by investors to avoid all MBS. Even Ginnie Mae securities, which have the full faith and credit of the US Government, are also at historically wide spreads to treasuries. The lack of broad interest in MBS has caused liquidity to suffer making it difficult to enter and exit the market efficiently.

FDIC Corporate Bond Guarantee
Goldman Sachs announced today that they will be the first to issue corporate debt under the insurance program provided by the FDIC. Under this program, some corporations, mostly banks, are allowed to issue corporate debt, with maturities between 31 days and three years. The FDIC will insure the bond, protecting the investor in case of default, for a fee of about 1% per year which is paid by the issuer.

Pricing has yet to be announced for this three year issue, but speculation around the market leaves many to expect yields around that of agency debt. Fannie and Freddie debt currently trades around 160 basis points over treasuries.

Cliff J. Reynolds
Jr.Junior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks posted the largest two-day rally since 1987 – following the largest two-day decline on the DOW since 1987 and since 1933 for the S&P 500, in the previous two sessions -- after the government said it would backstop $306 billion of Citigroup’s troubled assets and (this is key) provided the bank with a capital injection without wiping out current shareholders.
(This was the mistake of the Bear Stearns deal, and the terrible mistake of the Fannie/Freddie decision. By wiping out the shareholder, in the name of avoiding moral hazard, the government kicked off a bear raid in which short-sellers roll through the list of bank stocks knowing, as their trouble increases, the government may step in to help yet drive the stock price below bankruptcy value in the process. It appears they’ve learned from this mistake; mark it down as yet another unintended consequence of government action.)

Stocks continue to exhibit large swings even as we remained in positive territory the entire session yesterday. One would think, by way of the percentage changes, that the chart below tracked a multi-month period rather than one day’s worth of activity if it weren’t labeled.


The market may have also received a boost from the prospect that a major stimulus package will be coming. We’d have more confidence a sustained rally would ensue if this were a broad-based tax-cut related stimulus that increases after-tax return expectations on both capital and labor. I’m not sure $500-$700 billion in infrastructure projects (which is what’s expected) is truly igniting this rally as the budget fallout will be huge. Not the $300-$400 billion budget deficits that the media always rails on – deficits that are quite manageable in a $14 trillion economy -- but something that approaches $1.5 trillion. In any event, it didn’t seem to hurt yesterday and there will be specific industries that benefit big time from this type of action.

In the end, no society in history has spent itself out of these situations and the U.S. isn’t going to make history in this regard. Lower tax rates are key right now because we’re dealing with a lack of confidence. Lower tax rates on income permanently increases disposable income (as permanent as Washington gets anyway) and lower tax rates on capital carry with then incentive effects to take risk, which would be most evident in a stock-market upswing. The point is they affect behavior. To ignore these realities is a mistake. Nevertheless, so long as we do not raise tax rates, we’ve got to view that as a positive here.

Also helping things was President-elect Obama’s promulgation of his economic team, which includes some good, some bad in my view but they are all very capable people. There are people such as Christina Romer, who was appointed chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, that have written about the harm higher tax rates have on the economy, so that’s a good sign for now.

On this topic, the President-elect did miss an opportunity the way I see it. When he was taking questions, a reporter asked about his plans on tax rates. He could have clearly stated the current tax rates would be allowed to expire at the end of 2010, rather than repealing them sooner. Instead, he passed on answering the question; our feel is stocks could have had a 10% day, and more important than that such a statement would have encouraged a sustained rally, but alas we didn’t get that one. Still, it was a great day, so I won’t complain. With Thanksgiving a couple of days away, the fact that we’ve got a shot as delaying changes in tax rates is something for which to be thankful.

Market Activity for November 24, 2008

On the economic front, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported home resales dropped in October, just as the pending home sales data two weeks back suggested, and prices fell by the most on record.

Total existing home sales fell 3.1% in October to 4.98 million at an annual rate from a downwardly revised level of 5.14 million units in September – previously reported at 5.18 million.

This data involves both single and multi-family dwellings. Single-family existing home sales fell 3.3%; multi-family (condos etc.) slipped 1.8%.

Sales fell in all four major regions in October, showing the biggest decline in the Midwest – down 6%; the South endured a declined of 3.2%. The best performing region was the West, where sales fell 1.6%. This is consistent with the direction sales have taken over the past few months as West-region sales are up 31.5% at an annual rate for the last past three months.

The median price for existing homes fell the most on record, plunging 11.3% last month from the year-ago level.

For the month, prices in the West fell 7.8%, down 1.2% in the Northeast, fell 3.5% in the South and were up in the Midwest – rising 3.2%. (As sales have picked up in the West over the past few months – even though October was down – this was due to big price declines as foreclosures have helped to push Western-region prices down 26.7% on a year-over-year basis.)


The housing market is still searching for a bottom, but the good news is that we have hovered around this 5 million units range for eight months – so maybe we’re finding it. The unfortunate reality is that sales are coming at the expense of declining prices, but this is what needs to occur. We’ll note that existing home prices are still up 32% since January 2000 – the trouble spot is for those homes bought since 2004, which is an awful lot of homes.

The supply of existing homes (based on the current sales pace and in month’s worth of supply) ticked up slightly and remains elevated. This figure needs to come back down to seven months’ worth and once it hits six we’ll be back in business; we’ve got a ways to go, but when sales activity snaps back, the figure will fall quickly.


For those that did not buy more than they could afford though, time will reverse this course but we may have to wait a couple of years for prices to slowly increase. Our own judgment (or my judgment rather as I won’t speak for others as the assumption may prove to be well off the mark), is that prices will flatten out by next summer. By that point the sales and price data will depend on the more traditional determinants – the job market and income levels.

Have a great day!



Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Monday, November 24, 2008

Afternoon Review

Citigroup (C) +57.82%
In order to strengthen capital, reduce risk and increase liquidity, C has reached an agreement with the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC.

Citigroup will receive another $20 billion from TARP (on top of the $25 billion they have already received) as well as $306 billion of U.S. government guarantees for troubled mortgages and toxic assets to stabilize the company after shares plunged 60 percent last week.

WSJ.com provided this short summary of terms.

Other financial shares performance today:

  • Bank of America (BAC) +27.20%
  • JPMorgan & Chase (JPM) +21.39%
  • T. Rowe Price Group (TROW) +9.42%
  • Raymond James Financial (RJF) +20.35%
  • Principal Financial Group (PFG) +24.70%


Arch Coal (ACI) +11.38%, Peabody Energy (BTU) 15.04%
It looks like some people are starting to acknowledge that coal stocks are oversold and long-term fundamentals remain strong. Unlike oil companies whose profits will fall this year after crude futures dropped, coal producers work on long-term sales contracts that cushion them from falling prices. Coal demand across the globe is far less sensitive to economic conditions than other commodities. In addition, long-term trends for global coal demand are quite impressive.

I have said multiple times that coal stocks have been unfairly punished (which is partly due to fund liquidations and a general retreat from commodity related holdings).

This article (which I highly recommend for those interested in ACI or BTU) suggests that others are starting to acknowledge the value in coal stocks.


Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) +1.30%
JNJ announced it will acquire Omrix Boipharmaceuticals (OMRI) for approximately $438 million in cash, or $25 per share. The offer represents a premium of roughly 18 percent over Omrix’s closing price last week.

Omrix will operate as a stand-alone entity in one of JNJ’s companies, and will help provide an opportunity to strengthen JNJ’s presence in active, biologic-based heostates and convergent products for various surgical applications.

The acquisition is expected to be break-even to slightly dilutive to JNJ’s EPS in 2009.


TIPS
Another good article on TIPS, this time in today’s Wall Street Journal “Ahead of the Tape” column.

--

Peter Lazaroff, Junior Anlayst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks were setting up for another down day on Friday by the time the afternoon session rolled around, but received a jolt on news that Federal Reserve Bank of New York President Tim Geithner was to become the next Treasury Secretary.

The broad market endured another volatile session, bouncing 4% between intraday peak and trough, until the news on Geithner was released, which sparked a 7.5% rally to the upside in the final hour of trading that made those 4% moves appear tame.


The market had been waiting for President-elect Obama’s Treasury pick for a couple of days now, as they had to watch Health and Human Services and Attorney General choices first – people were wondering why these posts came before Treasury, which is the second-most important position right now.

The certainty of the pick assuaged concerns as Geithner will bring continuity. He has specific knowledge of the TARP as well as various Fed facilities that have been put in place over the past year. He’s extremely talented, let’s hope he has the next president’s ear.

Market Activity for November 21, 2008

Yesterday President-elect Obama followed that up by choosing Lawrence Summers as his top economic advisor – what should be viewed as the most important post since the occupant will be devising the next stimulus package.

Mr. Summers is a quintessential Keynesian – one who sees rebate checks and public works programs as the best ways to stimulate. He also advocates higher tax rates.

The market has had enough with rebate checks after seeing they had virtually zero effect the past two times implemented – 2001 and 2008; it shuns tax hikes and can probably take or leave infrastructure projects. Problem with the latter, forgetting that productivity growth and allowing the market to direct capital are the best ways to create jobs and allocate resources – is that it takes 12-18 months to implement, at which time the economy could already be back on the road to recovery. (For those that watched the Obama’s YouTube address on Saturday it was obvious we’re getting infrastructure programs galore.) Plain and simple, the market must be free to allocate resources, central planning efforts to assume this role cannot achieve the desired effect. However, so long as tax rates are not raised, the market should be able to deal with it.

Two things were leaked with the Summers announcement. First, he will be next in line for the Fed Chairman job, which means Bernanke is gone in 2010. Second, the Obama team will wait for the current tax rates to expire at the end of 2010 instead of raising rates before then. This would be a huge announcement since some of what the market has priced in is that tax rates on capital and small businesses will be going up before then.

But that was yesterday’s news, this morning we have new developments as things move at light speed these days. Since Friday night it was being reported the government would offer assistance to Ctigroup as the stock got hammered by 55% over the last three sessions. The company has been saying its capital position is adequate, but few were believing it as the continuous write-down circle means Tier 1 capital ratios that exceed standards today can plunge below levels to be deemed “well-capitalized” two months later.

According to the plan, the government will use $20 billion in TARP money (on top of the $25 billion Citi just received, a lot of good that did) in exchange for $27 billion in preferred shares that yield 8%. The government will also backstop, or guarantee, $306 billion worth of troubled mortgages and toxic assets.

The good news seems to be that the short-sellers’ raid on bank stocks may end. The raids that began with the Bear Stearns deal was easy money for short-sellers as all they had to do was push a stock price low enough (of course a banks over-leveraged position allows this to occur, but mark-to-market accounting exacerbates the issue) at which point the government would step in and wipe-out the current shareholder, making sure the price dropped further – even below the bankruptcy price. Now that this deal, while it dilutes the current shareholder, does not wipe out the shareholder it may prove superior to the deals heretofore.

In the end though, it seems we can throw $50, $100 billion at Citi but I’m not sure what good it does after a few months time in terms of capital. What needs to be done is either to get these troubled assets off the balance sheets of banks – the original TARP proposal – or end the destructive policy of mark-to-market accounting for assets with a 10-20 year lives.

Moving to the standard that was in place prior to November 2007 seems to make much of the concerns disappear as banks do not have to raise more capital and provide more collateral (which means more asset sales and thus pushing asset prices even lower) each time the long-term assets are marked lower. The prior standard meant that capital ratios were determined by the original cost of the asset. This way firms do not allow their capital to decline when the asset rises in price as occurred during the housing boom and they do not have to have to raise capital when the asset falls in price now that the housing market is in serious correction mode.

Further, we may not see the end of this problem until these troubled assets start trading and we get some price discovery. This is why we’ve advocated eliminating capital gains taxes on these assets to get bids flowing. These assets, while some are truly toxic, have more value than they are currently being marked to and the vast majority have cashflows running off of them. That is, if the tax were eliminated, I think we’d find that values are closer to 60 cents on the dollar rather than the 20 cents that fire-sale prices are valuing these assets.

The Obama Team

President-elect Obama promulgates his economic team today, most of which we already know. Some are better then others in my view, but they are all extremely capable people. The market will want to officially hear that his tax-rate agenda is delayed until they expire December 2010. While it would be best to lower tax rates, or at least leave current rates unchanged, the market may receive another jolt from the announcement to delay. At that point, stock valuations will have to deal with lower after-tax return expectations in 2010, but may be able to deal with it better by then.

The Economy

On the economic front, this morning we’ll get existing homes sales for October, which will remain very weak if the pending home sales data we received two weeks back is any indication – and it generally is.

Have a great day!


Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Friday, November 21, 2008

Afternoon Review

Citigroup (C) -19.96%
According to the Wall Street Journal, C has considered selling some or all of the company due to the sharp drop in Citi’s stock price. The report indicates that internal discussions at C are preliminary, and are not an indication that C’s management and board are backing down from their view that the firm has ample capital.

With $2 trillion in assets on its balance sheet, a C buyout would dwarf other recent takeovers. It also limits the number of firms that would be capable of buying the banking giant.

I recommend checking out this posting on WSJ’s blog Deal Journal, which compares Citigroup’s situation to that of Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch.

Dell (DELL) -5.20%
DELL reported better-than-expected 3Q earnings; however, the upside surprise was largely a result of cost cutting measures, rather than strong revenue results or increased profitability. The company has cut 8,300 jobs this year, bringing SG&A expenses down to 6.7 percent of revenue from 11 percent of revenue from a year ago. DELL credited its increased gross margin to a better product mix with more sales of higher margin software, peripherals and services. DELL spent $400 million to repurchase 21 million shares in 3Q, with the number of diluted outstanding shares falling 2 percent from the prior quarter and 14 percent from a year ago. DELL attributed its negative operating cash flow to slowing global industry demand in October.

The company did not give guidance, but expects global IT end-user demand will continue to be challenging. In turn, DELL will continue to cut costs and has implemented a hiring freeze across the company.

HJ Heinz (HNZ) +4.08%
HNZ easily topped quarterly earnings estimates and reaffirmed its fiscal 2009 earnings guidance. Revenues rose 3.5 percent year-over year, slightly less than estimates. All segments generated year-over-year organic sales growth, with the exception of U.S. foodservices. HNZ, which gets 55 percent of revenue overseas, received a $92 million pretax currency benefit on its decision to hedge against foreign currency gains.

Amgen (AMGN) +9.52%
The drugmaker’s medicine for a bleeding disorder received a “positive opinion” from European health advisors, which usually leads to regulatory approval.

This Bloomberg article discusses the unprecedented levels of bankruptcy potential among biotech firms. AMGN has said that it expects to be an acquirer in the coming years. With over $9.8 billion in cash and marketable securities plus free cash flow generation of over $1 billion a quarter, AMGN is in a terrific position to take advantage of the industry landscape.

Caterpillar +5.57%
CAT is predicting that more countries will create infrastructure stimulus plans similar to the program that China unveiled this month.

This article from the December 1 issue of Newsweek reviews the potential implications for infrastructure companies as countries around the globe consider stimulus packages focused on infrastructure. Such stimulus packages would benefit a number of companies like Caterpillar (CAT), Jacobs Engineering (JEC), Harsco Corporation (HSC), General Electric (GE), Emerson Electric (EMR), etc.

Wal-Mart (WMT) +4.46% %
WMT announced that CEO Lee Scott is stepping down and will be replaced by Mike Duke, effective February 1, 2009. WMT’s stock has outperformed the market since his appointment in January 2000, declining 15.8 percent compared to the S&P 500’s decline of 29.5 percent (both including dividends), as of November 14.

Quick Hits

  • Arch Coal (ACI) surged 17.59 percent on news that George Soros’ hedge-fund firm bought 2.9 million shares of ACI.
  • Microsoft (MSFT) advanced 12.26 percent after being upgraded at Oppenheimer.
  • Autodesk (ADSK) has lost 14.57 percent as selling pressure mounts. The company fell out of favor when it issued downside guidance for the fourth quarter. Shares have also been downgraded by a few analysts.
  • Google (GOOG) seems to roll out with a new feature to improve their search engine every week.
  • Gas Prices Spiral Down to Near $2
  • Weekend trivia: Since the Lehman bankruptcy on September 15, only one S&P 500 company has posted gains through today. Which company is it?
--

Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S stocks got wacked again yesterday, down 12% over the last two sessions, but everyone knows this by now. Right? Some have suggested I start talking about other things, such as the weather; although, the temperature in St. Louis isn’t going to cheer anyone up.

Whatever happened to global warming? I yearn for that warming trend, even if it peaked in 1998, but that won’t stop Henry Waxman from fighting it – we see he’s ousted the business-friendly John Dingell from the House Energy Committee Chairmanship. That’s what we need, someone who proposes austere regulations to cool a climate that’s already begun to do the job on its own. Man, I’m off on a tangent with that one.

Maybe we’ll start reporting on college basketball scores since the season has kicked off – Duke will give NC all they can handle in the ACC this year.

Possibly we’ll begin a daily commentary on pirate activity, since that’s become the entrepreneurial endeavor of late. Maybe shipping firms should just start dropping 10% of their goods off in Somalia – that’s essentially what’s occurring now anyway.

Why ships are not armed and rules of engagement are dangerously weak is beyond me. Now there’s talk of choosing circuitous shipping lanes, paths that would delay delivery times by 8-14 days, and of course raise costs. I guess blowing speed boats loaded with modern-day Barbary pirates out of the water makes too much damned sense.

Market Activity for November 20, 2008

As Andy Kessler discussed in yesterday’s WSJ, we should all ignore the market for a couple of months as it is not trading on fundamentals but rather the de-leveraging event is pushing values lower as hedge funds fall off the map, investors demand their cash back and this triggers mutual fund investors to do the same – what seems to be an endless circle.

This is rather good advice, and it would do us all some good to ignore things for a while, so maybe we will begin to talk about other things. Certainly investors are ignoring the ultra-low multiple of 11.77 times trailing 12-month earnings on indices such as the NYSE Composite and the fabulous 5.49% dividend yield that accompanies it. So why can’t we also ignore the daily pummeling that’s resultant of the over-leveraged nature of the previous few years – a decision certainly inspired by a mistaken Fed that kept rates way too low for too long back in 2003-2005.

There’s something like 20%-30% of S&P 500 members – what’s supposed to be a large cap index – trading at mid-small cap levels. This should be telling the longer-term investor something, but we understand it’s difficult during these times to see things as half-full.

For sure there are economic issues as the credit freeze-up that began in September all but put a halt to inter-bank lending, did major damage to commercial-paper issuance and caused businesses (even those that didn’t have financing problems) to simply put the brakes on capital spending projects. As a result, unemployment will continue to rise (and don’t forget that the jobless rate doesn’t peak until a year after a recession has ended), at least the next two quarters of GDP will contract (with the current-quarter’s degree of contraction being the worst since 1982) and global growth will slow substantially, if it escapes recession. But the market is trading at levels that already assumes much higher unemployment rates, inflation and earnings declines.

Try to hold steady, while it’s tough to see a multi-year rally taking place right now, we’ll see a powerful intermediate-term snap back from these levels.

Crude and the Dollar

The price of oil continue to plunge – good for the consumer. Although tough for many businesses to manage around; there’s no hedging strategy that can offset these swings.


Same is true for the greenback in terms of those with international sales.


The Economy

The Labor Department released its weekly data on jobless claims and it showed a higher-than-expected 27,000 jump to 542,000 in the week ended November 15.

The four-week average on claims (chart below) increased 15,750 to 506,500 – the highest level since 1983. (Longer-term readers will notice we’ve extended the chart to show the 1980 and 1981-1982 recessions, since the four-week average has hit those levels.

This measure (four-week average for claims) has averaged 404,000 during 2008, as the economy has shed 1.2 million payroll positions – 54% of which has occurred over the past three monthly readings. That compares to an average 321,000 in 2007, as the economy added 1.1 million payroll positions.


The number of people staying on benefit rolls in the week ended November 8 – one-week lag from the initial claims figure – rose 109,000 to 4.012 million, the highest rate since December 1982. Although, we’ll point out, again, when one adjusts for the rise in the labor force continuing claims would have to hit 5.3 million to truly compare with the 1982 recession. Back then the labor force stood at 112 million, today it is 155 million, so while 4 million in continuing claims is an elevated reading, it’s not as high as the unadjusted reading makes it seem.

We’ll note continuing claims have jumped for the obvious reason: jobs have been more difficult to come by since Lehman went down in September and triggered the credit event. But the government also continues to increase the period someone can remain on the dole, increasing the period to 26 weeks from 13 weeks. The House passed another 13-week extension last night, ready for the president to sign. This also sends continuing claims higher, at the margin.


In total, this is a very weak report and since this is also the week the Labor Department engages in its November employment survey – for the initial estimate at least – it means the next employment report will be worse than the last. Initial claims have averaged 525,000 for the first two weeks of November, which corresponds with a roughly 350,000 decline in nonfarm payrolls.

In a separate report, the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank released its manufacturing survey (known as the Philly Fed Index) for November and, guess what? I know you’re going to be surprised. It was horrendous.

The survey’s general activity index fell to -39.3, the lowest level since hitting -48.2 in October 1990; hey, at least we didn’t fall to 1974 or 1981 levels. We’ve been here before.

All sub-indices posted terrible readings as well. The new and unfilled orders indexes both deteriorated from very weak levels hit in October and the shipments index remained unchanged.

The credit crisis that caused economic growth to collapse over the past three months has forced companies to cut investment and production, which is most evident in these manufacturing figures.


However, the inventory index remained in negative territory as well, which means respondents view stockpile levels as low. And this is true economy wide, as witnessed in the business inventory index and ISM survey. No, one should not expect these levels to spur production over the next couple of months but the fact that they are low is unusual for an economic downturn.

It is the inventory bloat that generally determines the duration of an economic contraction, and while the current situation has been caused by other factors such as the credit event, low stockpiles should result in a ramp up in production a few months out. That is if Congress doesn’t go and do anything that crowds out and damages private sector growth – like forcing infrastructure projects and jacking up tax rates on small businesses to pay for health-care related schemes for anyone that is within 400% of the federal poverty line. This inventory situation is getting zero press, but it’s clearly one of the silver linings.

Real Response

We’ve touched on how the government has tried everything under the sun except a tax-rate response to current issues. In the end, only time can reverse that which ails the economy, just as it took time for the housing froth and over-leveraged position within the financial sector to build.

But a tax-rate response can quickly bring back confidence and optimism like nothing else in the government’s arsenal. Further, it also provides incentive effects that speed up the process of finding a clearly price for certain mortgage assets and spurs a stock-market rally – two things that can immediately boost sentiment.

Roughly six months back we mentioned Congress needs to eliminate the capital gains tax on “troubled” mortgage assets; this would provide a huge incentive to take some risks here, and provide some pricing for this market that is finding few bids. Well, I heard a TV commentator express this idea last night for the first time, so maybe we’re slowly getting somewhere.

Of course, we’d like to go for the big bang and slash tax rates on all capital investments in half – same for dividends – and cut the corporate tax to at least 25%. This would drive optimism much higher and it would have an immediate effect. It would also, 12-15 months out, kick-start federal tax receipts. Now, please.

Instead, all we hear are rebate check, food stamp and state-aid schemes, even though these programs have failed to stimulate the economy in the past – often times prolonging economic weakness. Those attempting to explain why these actions have been ineffective say it’s because they were not large enough, which is why some are floating a $500 billion-$1 trillion “stimulus” package. This is insane. Just do what history has shown works.

I’ve written the White House regarding these topics. I’m sure the letters have made it to Josh Bolten’s desk, just as I’m sure Representative Henry Waxman will help to implement a common sense energy agenda.

Have a great weekend!



Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Afternoon Review

S&P 500 companies
As of today’s close, 117 stocks in the S&P 500 index are now trading for less than $10 a share, which is the greatest number of sub-$10 stocks in the index in at least 28 years. In October 2001, only 59 companies in the S&P 500 had share prices below $10. In October 1987, only 35 companies in the S&P 500 were below $10.

$10 is more than just a psychological barrier since some institutional investors cannot invest in shares below $10 and some bond contracts require companies above that level.

One-third of the entire index is not even qualified to be in the index – 182 stocks have market caps under $4 billion, the minimum value for consideration for S&P 500 membership. Plunging 47.71 percent so far this year, the S&P 500 is now worth just over $7 trillion, the index’s lowest collective market value in 11 years.


Financial Companies
Bailout Scorecard: Bloomberg compiled this list of all of the companies receiving money from the U.S. Treasury.

Financial shares tumbled on concerns that a deepening recession will generate more losses and weaken demand for financial services. Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co. analysts estimate that the U.S. may need to spend as much as $1.2 trillion to stabilize the eight largest financial institutions.

  • Bank of America (BAC) -13.86%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) -17.88%
  • Citigroup (C) -26.41%

General Electric (GE) -11.14%
GE in Talks With Four Asian Sovereign Wealth Funds

Wal-Mart (WMT) -0.67%, Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) -3.63%
Wal-Mart Holds Key to Holiday Success for Dell, Hewlett-Packard

Dell (DELL) -5.22%
Dell Profit Beats Analyst Estimates as Expenses Fall

Amgen (AMGN) -6.54%
Amgen, Takeda’s Drug for Lung Cancer Suspended After Deaths

Crude Oil
Brent Falls Below $50, First Time Since 2005, as Demand Slumps
Pirates Demand $25 Million Ransom for Hijacked Oil-Laden Tanker

--

Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst

Fixed Income Recap

Treasuries
As expected when stocks have a horrible day, treasuries rally hard. The 30 year was up more than 3 points in price and the curve flattened 10 basis points on the day to 228 basis points. The spread between the yield on the two and ten year has dropped 34 basis points from its high of 262 last Thursday.

MBS
Agency mortgages were mostly unchanged on the day. New issue 30 year passthroughs ended the day flat. Shorter, 15 year collateral, traded down slightly. Mortgages look very attractive here, but volatility is also extreme. Just to put it in prospective, mortgage spreads have had 40 basis point swings over several day periods eight times over the past three months. Incredible!

Credit
Credit spreads widened again today, with banks leading the way this time. Uncertainty of future government aid and a terrible outlook from company executives are driving the cost of default protection up across the board. The likelihood of default is often measured by the cost one must pay to protect a bond against default. These costs are at record highs.


Cliff J. Reynolds Jr.
Junior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks got slapped yesterday, losing half of the day’s decline in the final hour (haven’t heard that before), as the latest housing data showed construction activity continues to weaken and comments from the FOMC’s latest meeting illustrated most members expect the economy to contract into 2009 – although that’s hardly a surprise and valuations more than reflect this reality.

Financial, industrial and basic material stocks took the brunt of the beating, but on days in which the broad market gets bashed by 6%, even traditional safe havens like consumer staples and utility shares get clocked as well, which occurred.

Yesterday we mentioned how the S&P 500, after moving below the October 27 closing low of 848 intraday, reversed course to rally in the final hour. Obviously, this move was meaningless as we fell through that mark yesterday – 5% below that level in fact. The October 2002 multi-year low of 776 may be the next test in line.

That low was hit on October 9, 2002 – the all-time high of 1565 was hit October 9, 2007, interesting how things match up like this – marked a pretty depressing period, we recall it vividly. The same mood is in play this go around – it took the January 2003 tax proposal (and passage five months later) to bring confidence and sentiment back. Unfortunately, we’re trying everything except a tax-rate response this time.

Market Activity for November 18, 2008

I’ve got to say things have become quite ridiculous. Sure there are concerns, major concerns. We’ve got housing that fails to show any sign of rebound, consumer and financial institutions that are in the process of de-leveraging and global economies moving into recession – reducing the export activity that was helping to offset the economic drag from housing. Oh, and businesses remain extremely cautious, which means business equipment spending won’t provide a catalyst over the next few months.

But let’s face it, valuations on a number of indices reside at the lowest levels in nearly 20 years and an abundance of stocks offer dividend yields above that paid on the 10-year Treasury note. There are concerns about the sustainability of a rally (whenever it occurs) on top of everything else; make no mistake the market is freaked out over the possible direction of future tax and trade policy – not to mention government spending proposals that make the past eight years look like an exercise in frugality. However, we’re going to rally big time from these levels, the market is hugely oversold at this point.

(A possible bright spot on the policy front is the current market action is sending a clear message to all of those on the Hill that desire to take even more money from the private sector as if they know how to allocate it better than those who actually make it. As a result, they may be forced to hold back on their stated agendas and that may just incite a rally that is sustainable. In any event, no matter how stocks behave over the next several months, we’re looking at the greatest buying opportunity since 1974. I know, no one wants to hear that right now, but investing takes patience and this virtue is certainly being tried right now.)

The Economy

On the economic front, the Labor Department reported the consumer price index fell a large 1% in October due to the plunge in energy prices – the largest monthly decline since records began in 1947. The year-over-year figure fell meaningfully, dropping to 3.7% from 4.9% in September.

Again, as we discussed yesterday, this is a result of the Fed-induced jump in commodity prices (particularly energy, which doubled in the eight months that followed August 2007) in the first-half of the year. If not for that surge, the massive decline in energy prices during October would have been highly unlikely. So those thinking deflation here are off base in our view as the situation is not one in which all prices are declining, but rather resultant from the commodity bubble bursting.

While the vast majority of commodity prices have declined in a precipitous manner, it’s the fuels components that pushed CPI down by this degree. Interestingly, CPI ex-energy came in flat last month and would have risen if not for a large 2.3% decline in new vehicle prices and a 5.3% tumble in the price of used vehicles. Vehicles make up 7.2% of the index.

In any event, this is buying the Federal Reserve some time, but when economic activity begins to bounce back they’ll need to take some of their easing and massive liquidity injections back out of the system.



The core rate also declined in October (the first since 1982), which is a nice sign – especially since that producer price core rate showed a surge via Tuesday’s release. It is somewhat disturbing though to see many food component prices continue to rise. Also, the personal care component within CPI jumped 0.4% in October, which reflects the jump in paper and packaging prices in Tuesday’s producer price report. Again, the consensus is concerned about a deflationary environment, but that concern will shift to one of inflation when the economy bounces back. (I recall the Fed was concerned about deflation in 2003, which is what led them to keep rates to low for too long – the preponderant element to the housing bubble and over leverage within the financial sector).

Under normal circumstances, we would not be so hawkish on future rates of inflation (brushing off the large move in headline CPI since records began and the most since 1982 on the core rate) if not for the huge levels of both monetary easing from the Fed. It is difficult to see inflation remaining tame after a multi-month respite from the elevated levels of the past year as M1 money supply has jumped 30% at an annual rate over the past six months. This is a period of disinflation (declines in the rate of growth rather than a sustained period in which all prices actually move negative) due to the plunge in energy prices from extreme elevations and lower demand as global growth contracts.



In a separate report, the Commerce Department reported housing construction starts fell 4.5% in October, which was less than expected but as the chart below shows the pain continues. Starts fell to 791,000 at an annual rate, the lowest since records began in 1959.

This is the first look at starts for the current quarter and indicates the housing sector will weigh heavily on Q4 GDP. We could be in for a real rate of GDP decline that’s closer to 4.0% than the 3.0% that many are currently forecasting – housing’s drag on economic growth will extend to the 11th straight quarter for the current period and this one may be the most significant believe or not.


That said, there has been much progress made in lowering the homes available for sale – I know the word progress seems out of place, but supply needs to be cut – and we should see the bottom here. Surely the housing market will remain weak for several months still, as foreclosures lag and will keep supply (at the current sales rate) elevated, but we’re getting there. (Also, in terms of GDP, based on what we currently know, the fourth-quarter reading will prove to be the worst of it, in my view.)

Building permits dove 12% in October – a much larger than expected drop – to 708,000 units. Single-family permits fell 14.5%, and multi-family units (condos etc) were down 7.1%. This permits data shows things will not get better for current-month activity, so the November reading for housing starts will be just as weak.


Bernanke & Co.

In a separate note, the Federal Reserve released it minutes (notes essentially) from the October 29 meeting when they decided to cut their target on fed funds back to the “scene of the crime” of 1.00%. Touching on all of their comments regarding the economy would be a waste of time as we talk about the data each day, but their near-term outlook is worth mentioning.

FOMC participants were divided on 2009 growth, particularly in the back-half. Some expected the economy to recover by mid-2009, and some judged the period of weakness to persist through next year.

Our take is the economy is seeing its worst levels in the current quarter and weakness (while slightly improved) will extend into the first quarter of 2009. However, there’s a huge amount of monetary easing that has been pumped into the system, and so long as tax rates and trade pacts do not move in the wrong direction the impetus should be there for the business cycle to expand again. The current level of tax rates are very acceptable – certainly not onerous, although pushing rates on capital and income lower would provide a nice jolt to optimism – and if we get a few trade pacts that are currently held up, passed (sending the market a signal that protectionism is not on the horizon) we should be back on a nice trajectory.

No one really knows how this will play out or how long a contraction will last. But what we do know is U.S. businesses are streamlined like never before, corporations are sitting on mounds of cash, we’ve already endured 2 ½ years of serious housing construction contraction and inventory levels remains low. Once we begin to get our legs back, the resources are there and much of the housing froth of the 2003-2005 period has been removed. Also, no one talks about these low inventory levels. Once the current fears wane, the sales bounce will drive stockpile levels to a point where production must ramp up.

Further, the 60% plunge in the retail price of gasoline has substantially raised disposable income adjusted for fuel costs. Crude calculations place this income boost at $330 per month for the typical family – spread that out across the entire economy and that’s a massive increase.

Have a great day!




Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Afternoon Review

Markets Tumble
Click here for a PDF of our index performance tables.


Citigroup (C) -23.44%
C said in order to wind-down Citi-advised structured investment vehicles (SIVs), it has committed to acquire the remaining assets of the SIVs at their current fair value, which is estimated to be $17.4 billion, net of cash. Citi said it will be a nearly cashless transaction.

Other banks also dropped in anticipation that they will follow suit. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) fell 11.42 percent and Bank of America (BAC) retreated 14.02 percent.


St. Jude Medical (STJ) -9.03%
Medtronic’s (MDT) results yesterday showed that the U.S. ICD market was underperforming. According to MDT, the primary implant market was flat to declining. This is not good for the ICD market.
MDT also said replacement contributions were lessening. MDT felt an impact from Boston Scientific’s (BSX) new product launch and to the extent BSX is successful in gaining share, STJ will be less successful.
In a sluggish ICD market, market share becomes more central to STJ’s growth strategy. Without a robust ICD business, STJ earnings outlook certainly weakens.


Boeing (BA) -5.26%
The Wall Street Journal reports that BA is reworking its entire production schedule as it recovers from a machinist strike. BA is adding as much as ten weeks to the original delivery date of more than 3,700 jetliners making up the company’s order backlog. The report stated Boeing already decided against trying to step up production due to concern that such a move could actually have consequences.

BA also announced that their defense unit plays to cut 800 jobs because it didn’t have enough orders for aerial refueling tankers.


Procter & Gamble (PG) -3.08%
PG and leading Internet search engine Google (GOOG) are swapping employees to collaborate on a advertising efforts, according to today’s Wall Street Journal.

--

Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks staged a late-session rally fueled by energy and information technology shares. A better-than-expected earnings announcement from Hewlett-Packard helped tech shares advance. Energy shares caught a bid as multiples and dividend yields on most of these stocks may have investors returning to the group after a six-month rout that’s driven the S&P 500 Energy Index down 43% from the peak hit in June.

The Dow Industrial Average fared better than the broad indices – which was more apparent prior to the close as most stocks spent much of the session lower --, bolstered by shares of HP after the company reported fourth-quarter profit will top analysts’ estimates. The shares gained 14%, which amounted to 33 Dow points. For clarity, if the stock’s advance had been commensurate with the rest of tech-land the Dow’s gain would have been closer to 1.4% than the 1.83% that significantly outpaced the advance in the broad market.

The S&P 500 wants to test the October 13 intraday low of 818 and that may just have to occur before a rally that extends longer than a week takes place. The good news is we’re close to finding out whether it will be a successful test or move right past that level.

What was encouraging late yesterday, while we’re talking about this short-term action, is how the S&P 500 rallied hard in the final hour of trading after blowing through the October 27 closing low of 848. I don’t know if any of this technical stuff really matters, but it’s interesting to talk about nonetheless.


Market Activity for November 18, 2008

As we’ve touched on several times, stocks could be in a trading range that lasts not months but years – the direction of policy will determine which duration proves to be the case. But make no mistake, stocks are cheap. Granted, this is because the economic outlook is dismal, the aforementioned policy direction may prove to be less than market-friendly and earnings will decline for at least a couple of quarters.

However, the NYSE Composite trades at 13 times earnings, the Dow at 9.9 times and the S&P 500 (based on the past four quarters of profits) trades at 11. These are multiples that reflect an unemployment rate closer to 8% than the current 6.5%, an inflation rate that’s closer to double-digit territory than 4% and long-end Treasury curve rates much higher than the ultra-low 3.50%-4.10% where they currently reside. Yes, things will get worse before they get better, but if it does stocks seem to have fully priced these events in. For the longer-term investor, it is essential to look past these events, and benefit from the multi-year buying opportunity that has developed, but allocations must be in line with true personal risk levels.

Over the short-term we’ve got a strong shot at a powerful rally from these levels. From there, the sustainability of such a rally will depend on policy, which needs to be watched like a hawk right now.

The Economy

On the economic front, the Labor Department reported the headline producer price index (PPI) fell more than expected, down 2.8% in October – the estimate was for a 1.9% decline. To no one’s surprise, the plunge in energy prices enabled this substantial move lower – the total energy component within the index fell 12.8% in October, gasoline prices alone were down 24.9%.

The decline in headline PPI was the largest monthly drop in the 61-year history of the report – this record is made possible by the fed-induced run-up in energy prices that pushed oil prices up 65% in the first half of the year, natural gas up 76% and gasoline up 56%. As we come crashing from elevated energy prices, headline inflation moves with it.


Digressing

These market distortions cannot go on. The Fed must be weaned from its flawed Keynesian models that cause the members of the FOMC to make major monetary policy mistakes. Until this occurs, the booms will become shorter and the busts more pronounced. Commodity prices will seesaw, making it increasing difficult for energy-sensitive industries to manage through these large fluctuations.

But back to PPI, core producer prices (which exclude food and energy) actually rose, meaningfully in fact, which illustrates the drop in the overall reading was vastly a result of the move in energy prices. Many food products along with textile, paper and packaging, rubber and plastics and chemicals products continue to rise. As the chart below shows, core PPI hit 4.4% in October, which is a substantial move from the 4.0% posted for September. This is what we call embedded inflation. We’ll see how core CPI behaves this morning.


The component we’ve been watching most closely is core intermediate goods, which involves the materials that go into making finished goods. This measure, while elevated on a year-over-year basis, has come lower. The three-month annualized figure is now negative, down 1.7%. The continued plunge in certain metals prices -- steel is down to $144 per ton from a high of $523 in August and copper is down to $1.61 per pound from the peak of $4.09 in July – will push the Fed to believe that core inflation is not a problem.


However, as we’ve been discussing, the massive amounts of liquidity the Fed has pumped into the system makes the deflation, or more appropriately disinflation, argument tenuous at best and will likely keep core inflation from falling back to more appropriate levels. At the least, inflation will bounce after a multi-month respite as the credit event has pushed demand lower. But inflation is a monetary phenomenon and overall prices will jump 6-8 months out as the current level of caution subsides, credit begins to flow and the Fed will be reluctant to take back the current level of easing as their Keynesian models send them the wrong signals.

The Senate

The Democrats moved one step closer to a filibuster-proof Senate as the Alaska race has gone their way. This leaves the Minnesota recount and the Georgia run-off election. Odds are the Minnesota race will add another seat – making it 59 for the Ds. Therefore the Georgia run-off (December 2) will have much at stake, which means it will get nasty.

Modern Day Peg Legs

As you all probably know, pirate activity off the East Africa coast has picked up. Somalia pirates took over the Sirius Star – a Saudi-owned super tanker – late last week and yesterday it was reported high-jacked a huge shipment of grain. According to the AP, these pirates are holding 15 vessels they’ve raided over the past few months. It may be time for the U.S. Fifth Fleet to roll in to make a statement. This shipping lane must be protected.


This morning we get the consumer price index for October, housing starts and building permits. Headline CPI should show a substantial decline, we’ll be watching the core rate as that headline move should be almost totally due to lower energy prices. Housing starts and permits will likely show another leg down.

Have a great day!




Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Afternoon Review

Recommended Reading

  • This Bloomberg article summarizes the arguments made during Paulson’s visit to Capitol Hill.
  • Morningstar Advisor magazine compiled data on the historical market reaction to financial crises. Check out these charts for an all-stock portfolio and a 60/40 portfolio.
  • This article provides a quick and simple explanation of how TIPS offer an explicit hedge against investors’ number one enemy: inflation.

Dow Jones Industrial Average versus S&P 500
Today is a perfect example why the Dow is not a fair representation of the market, despite being the more popularly quoted index. The Dow advanced 1.83 percent to the S&P 500’s gain of 0.98 percent.

Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) +14.49%
HPQ announced solid preliminary results for its fiscal 4Q, which ended October 31. Revenue increased 19 percent from the same period a year ago, boosted by the recent acquisition of EDS and favorable currency exchange rates. Excluding benefits from the acquisition and currency, revenue only increased 2%, which is a significant deceleration from the mid- to high-single-digit growth enjoyed over the past few years.

HPQ led personal computer shipments in the most recent quarter with 18 percent of the market (DELL had 14 percent). The preliminary results suggest that despite worries about an economic slowdown, HPQ can still grow earnings.

Medtronic (MDT) -13.23%
MDT reported disappointing quarterly results and a downwardly revised outlook. Litigation costs was a big part of the poor quarterly numbers, but CEO William Hawkins also noted difficulties in the spinal care division, which suffered setbacks from FDA safety warnings, investigations of marketing practices and difficulties integrating Kyphon Inc.

Each major business segment posted strong revenue growth. The largest segment, cardiac rhythm disease management, saw revenue increase 8 percent year-over-year. The spinal segment increased 26 percent than from a year ago and the cardio unit increased revenues by 22 percent. These three groups accounted for 75 percent of revenue.

Yahoo (YHOO) +8.65%
YHOO soared on news that CEO Jerry Yang is stepping down from his post, raising speculation that Microsoft (MSFT) may show renewed interest. It is highly unlikely that MSFT would make a full acquisition of YHOO at this point in time since a souring economy and an expected change in the ranks of antitrust officials with the new presidential administration next year could affect the timing of any MSFT actions.

Most believe that MSFT should stay away from YHOO and continue to increase shareholder value through massive buybacks and raising the dividend. However, a deal between $10 and $13 (down from $33 per share offer Yahoo rejected) might make more sense for MSFT. Goldman Sachs Group said YHOO “might be worth $21” a share to an acquirer. Expect MSFT to get crushed if it purchases all of YHOO for such a price.

Another scenario is a deal involving a MSFT acquisition of YHOO’s search engine, which MSFT CEO Steve Ballmer acknowledged could make sense last month.

With ridiculous cash levels, MSFT is likely to take advantage of market conditions by making some sort of acquisition. For example, SAP (enterprise software) or Research in Motion (mobile platform development) could be potential targets that would enhance MSFT’s business.

Exxon Mobil (XOM) +4.02%; Chevron (CVX) +3.70%
XOM and CVX rose as crude oil for December delivery rose as much a 1.9 percent to $55.98 on speculation the hijacking of a Saudi Arabian supertanker off the east coast of Africa may cause shippers to divert vessels from the area, delaying deliveries to Europe and the U.S.

Citigroup (C) -5.96%
C continued to fall after the company announced yesterday plans to cut 52,000 jobs and may post a loss of 30 cents a share next year, compared with a previous estimate of $1.50 profit.

Jacobs Engineering Group (JEC) +2.82%
JEC gained on news that the company received a $70 million contract to provide design services for a 3-mile section of U.S. Route 301 in New Castle County, Delaware.

Anheuser-Busch (BUD) takeover completed
InBev NV completed its $52 billion purchase of Anheuser-Busch, creating the world’s largest beer manufacturer. The combined brewer is named Anheuser-Busch InBev and will trade starting November 20 as ABI on the Euronext Brussels stock exchange. The transaction will be financed with $45 billion in debt and a $9.8 billion bridge loan to be paid back with proceeds from a future stock sale.

--

Peter Lazaroff, Junior Analyst

Daily Insight

U.S. stocks looked ready to rally on a couple separate occasions yesterday but failed to hold that momentum, falling again in the final hour of trading.

The latest manufacturing data showed factory activity in the New York Federal Reserve Bank region remained very depressed, which certainly didn’t help investor sentiment, but this isn’t really news. Yes, the employment gauge tied to this index fell to the lowest level since 2001 (for context, this survey has only been around since 2000), but no one expected the labor market to bounce back in quick order. In fact the expectation is for another 250,000 decline in payrolls for the November survey, as the jobless claims figured indicate.

What’s missing is a tax-rate response; investors are begging for it, yet all we hear is an agenda to increase unemployment benefits, foods stamps, checks to those that do not pay federal income taxes (a.k.a. handouts) and infrastructure projects – projects that just shift jobs instead of creating them.

There’s only one way to actually create jobs: sustained economic growth. To accomplish this worker productivity must rise, which means the cost of capital must remain at a reasonable level. The most efficient way to keep the cost of capital low is to lower that which burdens the formation of capital – tax rates.

In reality, we may not even need reduced tax rates to inspire some confidence right now, just clear statements that tax rates on labor income and capital are not going higher, and thus will not erode after-tax return expectations. Heaven knows expectations are already in the dirt, this just compounds the situation.

Market Activity for November 17, 2008

News over the weekend that economies in Asia and Europe have officially slid into recession didn’t help psychology either, but it’s not like the equity markets have not priced this weakness in – the Dow Jones Industrial Average is 41% off its peak, the S&P 500 is off by 45% and the very broad NYSE Composite has lost 49%. The credit event that hit in September did major damage to the global economy, but the marketplace is fully aware of this cause and effect. Investors have moved on to worry that what should be a 12 month event will be prolonged by failed initiatives. This is really pathetic. It’s a pathetic display by the current political leaders and it’s a pathetic display by those that will take the helm in January.

The Treasury is in the process of using half of the $700 billion via the TARP plan to re-capitalize financial institutions. The Federal Reserve has more than doubled its balance sheet and vastly increased its level of risk to provide the system with massive amounts of liquidity. Yet, we choose to not even propose a tax-rate response in addition to these other actions? This makes zero sense; you don’t hold back on the most accurate and immediate policy tool in your arsenal. We need confidence and nothing drives confidence like a sustained stock-market rally – lower the tax rates on capital gains, dividends and corporate and individual incomes and the response is immediate. By neglecting this tool; by not even proposing such action, is a very big mistake.

The Economy

On the economic front, the New York Federal Reserve Bank released its manufacturing index for November, which showed factory activity remained very weak. Although, expectations for a nice pick up six months out appear to be rising.

The Empire Manufacturing index posted its third-straight negative reading, coming in at -25.43 in November after October’s -24.62. The index arrived at a reading of -25.43 as 43.9% of respondents reported a decrease in activity, while 18.5% reported an increase – 37.5% stated activity was unchanged.

The sub-indices that offer some picture of the next couple of months worth of readings came in very we also as the new orders and unfilled orders indices worsened.



The employment index exhibited the sharpest drop, falling to its lowest level since December 2001 – another bad sign for November payrolls; the initial jobless claims figure surpassed the 500k mark last week and now this number is another indication the November jobs report will be every bit as bad as the October reading.


All of that said, we will really have to wait for the Chicago and ISM manufacturing surveys – Chicago being the largest region for factory activity and the ISM being the national look – as Empire has not proven to be the best indicator in the past. Still, due to the level of weakness in Empire it’s clear the extremely depressed state of economic activity in October, extended into this month.

In a separate report, the Commerce Department reported that industrial production bounced back nicely from September’s weak report, although the bounce was due to weather and strike-related events in the prior month that caused the reading to post its largest decline in 59 years.


Industrial production easily surpassed the 0.2% expectation, jumping 1.3% for October after a horrendous downwardly revised 3.7% decline in September (the September reading was previously estimated to be down 2.8%) due to weather and strike-related forces as Hurricane Ike forced the shutdown of Gulf-coast energy production and the Boeing strike made the level of change from the prior reading plummet.

For October though things bounced back nicely as mining (largely oil and gas extraction) and utility output stormed back. Mining activity jumped 6.1% in October, following a hurricane-related 8.5% plunge during September.

Consumer goods production rebounded to post a 1.3% rise after falling 1.1% in the previous month. Business equipment production fell 2.2%; however, this was an improvement from the 7.1% decline in business-equipment production during September as the level of change was affected big time by the Boeing strike that began on September 2. This impasse ended roughly two weeks ago, but it will take some time to get production up and running again.

While it’s nice to see industrial production snap back, we do not expect this rebound to have legs as oil and overall mining activity is in the process of pulling back due to large declines in commodity prices. Also, the bounce was helped by the big decline in the previous month (ie. the level of change).

We’d look for another three-four months of weakness before the data becomes so depressed that activity begins a generally sustained rise.

Today’s Data

This morning we get producer prices for October. The overall index will show prices declined, due to the huge decline in energy prices. We’ll be watching the core intermediate goods figure for clues of imbedded inflation. This figure involves the materials used to make finished goods --excluding energy -- and barely budged in the previous reading.

It’s pretty clear overall inflation rates will come down substantially over the next couple of months, but as the economy comes back to life the massive amounts of liquidity the Fed has pumped into the system will very likely push prices higher again – Bernanke and Co. will be very reluctant to take this liquidity back out until it is more than clear the economy is back on its feet – ala the 2003-2005 mistake that kept rates too low for too long (real short-term interest rates were negative during this period, which subsidized debt and encouraged the increased level of borrowing).

In addition to the growth-enhancing tax policy mentioned above, it is essential the Fed gets its act together – monetary policy mistakes are at the origin of this mess.

Have a great day!






Brent Vondera, Senior Analyst