Visit us at our new home!

For new daily content, visit us at our new blog: http://www.acrinv.com/blog/

Monday, April 19, 2010

Eli Lilly (LLY) Earnings and Measuring the Costs and Impat of Healthcare Reform

Eli Lilly (LLY) became the first Big Pharma firm to give some concrete numbers relating to the cost of reform.

LLY trimmed its 2010 earnings guidance to reflect a 35-cent (full-year) impact from U.S. healthcare reform. The company projected government rebates related to healthcare reform to reduce full-year revenues by $350 million to $400 million. The healthcare reform-related charges in the first quarter amounted to 12 cents, or 9% of EPS.

The charges were higher than analysts were expecting, but this will not necessarily be the case for all drugmakers. Roughly 20% of LLY’s total sales are to government programs Medicare and Medicaid, both of which received discounts from pharmaceutical firms in the healthcare bill. As more pharma firms report earnings, I think we will see that LLY’s high exposure Medicare and Medicaid creates a disproportionately large impact for the firm relative to its peers.

It will take several years for the volume created by newly insured patients to offset the costs associated with the healthcare legislation. At the same time, I expect LLY to be one of the harder hit firms in the industry.

Shares of LLY are basically flat on today’s earnings release, but they have trailed the broader market over the past year. The firm’s pipeline will not offset the revenue loss expected from looming patent expirations and it seems inevitable that LLY will need to acquire a late-stage drugs.

Without additional revenues, LLY will need to slash its attractive dividend. Of course, any M&A activity would likely lead to a reduction in the payout anyways. The bigger downside to M&A is that it has historically destroyed shareholder wealth for drugmakers.

These concerns are well-known and something I’ve covered before; I’d say the bigger takeaway from LLY’s results is that investors will now expect the same level of disclosure regarding the impact from healthcare reform. That’s better than nothing, right?

Peter Lazaroff, Investment Analyst
www.acrinv.com

No comments: